The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Exploring patient involvement in healthcare decision making across different education and functional health literacy groups

Exploring patient involvement in healthcare decision making across different education and functional health literacy groups
Exploring patient involvement in healthcare decision making across different education and functional health literacy groups
Education and health literacy potentially limit a person's ability to
be involved in decisions about their health. Few studies, however, have
explored understandings and experiences of involvement in decision
making among patients varying in education and health literacy. This
paper reports on a qualitative interview study of 73 men and women
living in Sydney, Australia, with varying education and functional
health literacy levels. Participants were recruited from a community
sample with lower educational attainment, plus an educated sample of
University of Sydney alumni. The transcripts were analysed using the
'Framework' approach, a matrix-based method of thematic analysis. We
found that participants with different education conceptualised their
involvement in decision making in diverse ways. Participants with
higher education appeared to conceive their involvement as sharing the
responsibility with the doctor throughout the decision-making process.
This entailed verifying the credibility of the information and
exploring options beyond those presented in the consultation. They also
viewed themselves as helping others in their health decisions and
acting as information resources. In contrast, participants with lower
education appeared to conceive their involvement in terms of consenting
to an option recommended by the doctor, and having responsibility for
the ultimate decision, to agree or disagree with the recommendation.
They also described how relatives and friends sought information on
their behalf and played a key role in their decisions. Both education
groups described how aspects of the patient-practitioner relationship
(e.g. continuity, negotiation, trust) and the practitioner's
interpersonal communication skills influenced their involvement. Health
information served a variety of needs for all groups (e.g. supporting
psychosocial, practical and decision support needs). These findings
have practical implications for how to involve patients with different
education and literacy levels in decision making, and highlight the
important role of the patient-practitioner relationship in the process
of decision making.
0277-9536
1805-1812
Smith, Sian K.
ee5f6382-fa72-445a-8688-356b2d47d681
Dixon, Ann
6560c0af-d67b-4e6e-ad48-322dbaeececa
Trevena, Lyndal
0eeb2f6f-e14f-4a33-aa2b-ac7922562217
Nutbeam, Donald
352dc808-9160-42e7-8b52-b8cac02ad486
McCaffery, Kirsten J.
54bdb06e-053d-4fad-8c69-0e235a9bfd04
Smith, Sian K.
ee5f6382-fa72-445a-8688-356b2d47d681
Dixon, Ann
6560c0af-d67b-4e6e-ad48-322dbaeececa
Trevena, Lyndal
0eeb2f6f-e14f-4a33-aa2b-ac7922562217
Nutbeam, Donald
352dc808-9160-42e7-8b52-b8cac02ad486
McCaffery, Kirsten J.
54bdb06e-053d-4fad-8c69-0e235a9bfd04

Smith, Sian K., Dixon, Ann, Trevena, Lyndal, Nutbeam, Donald and McCaffery, Kirsten J. (2009) Exploring patient involvement in healthcare decision making across different education and functional health literacy groups. Social Science & Medicine, 69 (12), 1805-1812. (doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.056).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Education and health literacy potentially limit a person's ability to
be involved in decisions about their health. Few studies, however, have
explored understandings and experiences of involvement in decision
making among patients varying in education and health literacy. This
paper reports on a qualitative interview study of 73 men and women
living in Sydney, Australia, with varying education and functional
health literacy levels. Participants were recruited from a community
sample with lower educational attainment, plus an educated sample of
University of Sydney alumni. The transcripts were analysed using the
'Framework' approach, a matrix-based method of thematic analysis. We
found that participants with different education conceptualised their
involvement in decision making in diverse ways. Participants with
higher education appeared to conceive their involvement as sharing the
responsibility with the doctor throughout the decision-making process.
This entailed verifying the credibility of the information and
exploring options beyond those presented in the consultation. They also
viewed themselves as helping others in their health decisions and
acting as information resources. In contrast, participants with lower
education appeared to conceive their involvement in terms of consenting
to an option recommended by the doctor, and having responsibility for
the ultimate decision, to agree or disagree with the recommendation.
They also described how relatives and friends sought information on
their behalf and played a key role in their decisions. Both education
groups described how aspects of the patient-practitioner relationship
(e.g. continuity, negotiation, trust) and the practitioner's
interpersonal communication skills influenced their involvement. Health
information served a variety of needs for all groups (e.g. supporting
psychosocial, practical and decision support needs). These findings
have practical implications for how to involve patients with different
education and literacy levels in decision making, and highlight the
important role of the patient-practitioner relationship in the process
of decision making.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: December 2009
Organisations: Vice Chancellor Administration

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 154691
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/154691
ISSN: 0277-9536
PURE UUID: b4e7c2e3-6585-4c63-8901-9bb7a275ff63

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 25 May 2010 16:51
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 01:35

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Sian K. Smith
Author: Ann Dixon
Author: Lyndal Trevena
Author: Donald Nutbeam
Author: Kirsten J. McCaffery

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×