The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Participatory data analysis: a step too far?

Participatory data analysis: a step too far?
Participatory data analysis: a step too far?
Interest in participatory research methods has grown considerably in the spheres of research with children and young people and research with people with learning disabilities. This growth is rooted in different but related paradigm shifts in childhood and disability. I argue that despite developments in participatory approaches, participatory data analysis has been attempted less than participation in other aspects of research with either children or people with learning disabilities, and that the challenges involved in this are particularly under-explored and important with the latter where we need to investigate what is possible. I discuss why participation in analysis is often neglected before reviewing different responses to the challenge including examples of informal and formal, unstructured and structured, trained and untrained, explicit and implicit approaches. Finally I make the case for authentic reciprocal learning in exploring the potential benefits of participatory analysis to people and to research.
data analysis, emancipatory research, inclusion, learning difficulties, participatory methods
1468-7941
349-363
Nind, Melanie
b1e294c7-0014-483e-9320-e2a0346dffef
Nind, Melanie
b1e294c7-0014-483e-9320-e2a0346dffef

Nind, Melanie (2011) Participatory data analysis: a step too far? Qualitative Research, 11 (4), 349-363. (doi:10.1177/1468794111404310).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Interest in participatory research methods has grown considerably in the spheres of research with children and young people and research with people with learning disabilities. This growth is rooted in different but related paradigm shifts in childhood and disability. I argue that despite developments in participatory approaches, participatory data analysis has been attempted less than participation in other aspects of research with either children or people with learning disabilities, and that the challenges involved in this are particularly under-explored and important with the latter where we need to investigate what is possible. I discuss why participation in analysis is often neglected before reviewing different responses to the challenge including examples of informal and formal, unstructured and structured, trained and untrained, explicit and implicit approaches. Finally I make the case for authentic reciprocal learning in exploring the potential benefits of participatory analysis to people and to research.

Text
Participatory_Data_Analysis_for_eprints.doc - Author's Original
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Published date: 2011
Keywords: data analysis, emancipatory research, inclusion, learning difficulties, participatory methods
Organisations: Social Justice & Inclusive Education

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 161833
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/161833
ISSN: 1468-7941
PURE UUID: 040dd4a4-0551-4c62-8efc-c45ba29b151e
ORCID for Melanie Nind: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4070-7513

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 Aug 2010 09:00
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:49

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×