The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Interocular yoking in human saccades examined by mutual information analysis

Interocular yoking in human saccades examined by mutual information analysis
Interocular yoking in human saccades examined by mutual information analysis
Background: Saccadic eye movements align the two eyes precisely to foveate a target. Trial-by-trial variance of eye movement is always observed within an identical experimental condition. This has often been treated as experimental error without addressing its significance. The present study examined statistical linkages between the two eyes’ movements, namely interocular yoking, for the variance of eye position and velocity.

Methods: Horizontal saccadic movements were recorded from twelve right-eye-dominant subjects while they decided on saccade direction in Go-Only sessions and on both saccade execution and direction in Go/NoGo sessions. We used infrared corneal reflection to record simultaneously and independently the movement of each eye. Quantitative measures of yoking were provided by mutual information analysis of eye position or velocity, which is sensitive to both linear and non-linear relationships between the eyes’ movements. Our mutual information analysis relied on the variance of the eyes movements in each experimental condition. The range of movements for each eye varies for different conditions so yoking was further studied by comparing GO-Only vs. Go/NoGo sessions, leftward vs. rightward saccades.

Results: Mutual information analysis showed that velocity yoking preceded positional yoking. Cognitive load increased trial variances of velocity with no increase in velocity yoking, suggesting that cognitive load may alter neural processes in areas to which oculomotor control is not tightly linked. The comparison between experimental conditions showed that interocular linkage in velocity variance of the right eye lagged that of the left eye during saccades.

Conclusions: We conclude quantitative measure of interocular yoking based on trial-to-trial variance within a condition, as well as variance between conditions, provides a powerful tool for studying the binocular movement mechanism
1753-4631
S10
Maruyama, Masaki
d9fbf6f7-e24b-4887-b713-083c566e25a0
Fenwick, Peter B.C.
46662080-3051-4d22-9cf3-112258e6f1c4
Ioannides, Andreas A.
f2f17b28-63d5-411d-95e3-2c3fc1b97a4e
Maruyama, Masaki
d9fbf6f7-e24b-4887-b713-083c566e25a0
Fenwick, Peter B.C.
46662080-3051-4d22-9cf3-112258e6f1c4
Ioannides, Andreas A.
f2f17b28-63d5-411d-95e3-2c3fc1b97a4e

Maruyama, Masaki, Fenwick, Peter B.C. and Ioannides, Andreas A. (2010) Interocular yoking in human saccades examined by mutual information analysis. Nonlinear Biomedical Physics, 3 (4), supplement Consciousness and its Measures: Joint Workshop for COST Actions NeuroMath and Consciousness 29 November – 1 December 2009 Limassol, Cyprus, S10. (doi:10.1186/1753-4631-4-S1-S10).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Saccadic eye movements align the two eyes precisely to foveate a target. Trial-by-trial variance of eye movement is always observed within an identical experimental condition. This has often been treated as experimental error without addressing its significance. The present study examined statistical linkages between the two eyes’ movements, namely interocular yoking, for the variance of eye position and velocity.

Methods: Horizontal saccadic movements were recorded from twelve right-eye-dominant subjects while they decided on saccade direction in Go-Only sessions and on both saccade execution and direction in Go/NoGo sessions. We used infrared corneal reflection to record simultaneously and independently the movement of each eye. Quantitative measures of yoking were provided by mutual information analysis of eye position or velocity, which is sensitive to both linear and non-linear relationships between the eyes’ movements. Our mutual information analysis relied on the variance of the eyes movements in each experimental condition. The range of movements for each eye varies for different conditions so yoking was further studied by comparing GO-Only vs. Go/NoGo sessions, leftward vs. rightward saccades.

Results: Mutual information analysis showed that velocity yoking preceded positional yoking. Cognitive load increased trial variances of velocity with no increase in velocity yoking, suggesting that cognitive load may alter neural processes in areas to which oculomotor control is not tightly linked. The comparison between experimental conditions showed that interocular linkage in velocity variance of the right eye lagged that of the left eye during saccades.

Conclusions: We conclude quantitative measure of interocular yoking based on trial-to-trial variance within a condition, as well as variance between conditions, provides a powerful tool for studying the binocular movement mechanism

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 3 June 2010

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 162387
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/162387
ISSN: 1753-4631
PURE UUID: 90708864-2291-44e6-abd7-1d79cde00c74

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Aug 2010 15:14
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:02

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Masaki Maruyama
Author: Peter B.C. Fenwick
Author: Andreas A. Ioannides

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×