The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Reflections on the nature of ‘public ethics'

Reflections on the nature of ‘public ethics'
Reflections on the nature of ‘public ethics'
This paper offers reflections on the processes by which the Organ Donation Taskforce (of which the author was a member) reached its conclusion not to propose a 'presumed consent' model for organ donation. It also explores the role of the HGC (chaired by the author)and experiences from membership of the Committee on the Ethical Aspects of Pandemic Influenza and of the Nuffield Council's Working Party on Public Health Ethics.

The main themes are that 'public' ethics is a much more contingent process than academic work on similar issues; it needs to (a) take into account prevailing policy issues in related areas,(b) be expressed in terms that are sufficiently close to the prevailing professional discourse to have a reasonably hope of reception,(c) assess how positions will be represented in the media and what behavioural changes will follow in the actual political context, (d) create workable compromise formulations, from which people can reason even if they reach them by different arguments. Tentative conclusions emerge in relation to (a) the difficulties these contingencies imply for comparative work (both over time and between countries, which needs to take greater account of context, (b) appropriate grounds for critique of positions as 'public' ethics and distinguishing it from the critique appropriate in the more traditional academic contexts.

Further details available from jrm@soton.ac.uk
Montgomery, Jonathan
c4189a2c-86b8-466a-a7c8-985757206c04
Montgomery, Jonathan
c4189a2c-86b8-466a-a7c8-985757206c04

Montgomery, Jonathan (2010) Reflections on the nature of ‘public ethics'. Consent and Organ Donation, Keele, United Kingdom.

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Other)

Abstract

This paper offers reflections on the processes by which the Organ Donation Taskforce (of which the author was a member) reached its conclusion not to propose a 'presumed consent' model for organ donation. It also explores the role of the HGC (chaired by the author)and experiences from membership of the Committee on the Ethical Aspects of Pandemic Influenza and of the Nuffield Council's Working Party on Public Health Ethics.

The main themes are that 'public' ethics is a much more contingent process than academic work on similar issues; it needs to (a) take into account prevailing policy issues in related areas,(b) be expressed in terms that are sufficiently close to the prevailing professional discourse to have a reasonably hope of reception,(c) assess how positions will be represented in the media and what behavioural changes will follow in the actual political context, (d) create workable compromise formulations, from which people can reason even if they reach them by different arguments. Tentative conclusions emerge in relation to (a) the difficulties these contingencies imply for comparative work (both over time and between countries, which needs to take greater account of context, (b) appropriate grounds for critique of positions as 'public' ethics and distinguishing it from the critique appropriate in the more traditional academic contexts.

Further details available from jrm@soton.ac.uk

Slideshow
Reflections_on_The_Nature_of_‘Public_Ethics.ppt - Other
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (354kB)

More information

Published date: 9 December 2010
Venue - Dates: Consent and Organ Donation, Keele, United Kingdom, 2010-12-09

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 171491
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/171491
PURE UUID: f485bd02-fdf0-4964-8e8c-3fc4e163fd2f

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 18 Jan 2011 09:49
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:26

Export record

Contributors

Author: Jonathan Montgomery

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×