The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Methodological change in school effectiveness and improvement research

Methodological change in school effectiveness and improvement research
Methodological change in school effectiveness and improvement research
School Effectiveness and School Improvement have played an important part in developing and refining methods in educational research. However, we would hypothesize that this development has also led to a certain crystallization of these methods, to the extent that it is now possible to talk of a methodological orthodoxy in both effectiveness and improvement research. To test this hypothesis, we looked at articles published in 'School Effectiveness and School Improvement' between issue 1 of 2005 and issue 2 of 2010. Results show that both quantitative and qualitative studies are dominated by a limited range of data collection methods. Over 80% of qualitative studies reported on are case studies, with the remainder being other interview methods. Of quantitative studies, almost 60% are survey studies, and just under 23% use secondary data, such as international studies and national or local accountability data sets. Almost 16% of studies used quasi-experimental designs. In terms of data analysis, in quantitative studies almost 50% of papers use multilevel methods, while a further 35% use 'traditional' statistics, such as regression and parametric or non-parametric tests. In qualitative methods the vast majority of studies used some form of thematic analysis. Implications of these findings and recommendations for future research are provided.
Muijs, R.D.
62af2eff-0cb5-403b-81cc-7a3bfb3e640e
Muijs, R.D.
62af2eff-0cb5-403b-81cc-7a3bfb3e640e

Muijs, R.D. (2011) Methodological change in school effectiveness and improvement research. International Congress for School Effectiveness and School Improvement. 04 - 07 Jan 2011.

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

School Effectiveness and School Improvement have played an important part in developing and refining methods in educational research. However, we would hypothesize that this development has also led to a certain crystallization of these methods, to the extent that it is now possible to talk of a methodological orthodoxy in both effectiveness and improvement research. To test this hypothesis, we looked at articles published in 'School Effectiveness and School Improvement' between issue 1 of 2005 and issue 2 of 2010. Results show that both quantitative and qualitative studies are dominated by a limited range of data collection methods. Over 80% of qualitative studies reported on are case studies, with the remainder being other interview methods. Of quantitative studies, almost 60% are survey studies, and just under 23% use secondary data, such as international studies and national or local accountability data sets. Almost 16% of studies used quasi-experimental designs. In terms of data analysis, in quantitative studies almost 50% of papers use multilevel methods, while a further 35% use 'traditional' statistics, such as regression and parametric or non-parametric tests. In qualitative methods the vast majority of studies used some form of thematic analysis. Implications of these findings and recommendations for future research are provided.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 5 January 2011
Venue - Dates: International Congress for School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2011-01-04 - 2011-01-07

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 173601
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/173601
PURE UUID: 57f564c5-6139-4894-85e2-46fa08225449
ORCID for R.D. Muijs: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0131-8921

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Feb 2011 15:18
Last modified: 11 Dec 2021 04:28

Export record

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×