The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Discrimination of the neutral low back sitting posture in people with and without low back pain, before and after a shift of work

Discrimination of the neutral low back sitting posture in people with and without low back pain, before and after a shift of work
Discrimination of the neutral low back sitting posture in people with and without low back pain, before and after a shift of work
Background: The "neutral" lumbar posture is considered the position least likely to cause low back pain, with errors as little as 2° from the neutral spinal posture substantially decreasing the axial compressive load capacity of the spine. Accurate sensory feedback from, and activation of, appropriate trunk muscles is essential for appreciation and maintenance of the neutral spinal posture. If these muscles are dysfunctional due to low back pain and/or workrelated activity and fatigue, this might impair people’s ability to discriminate the neutral spinal posture. This study investigated whether LBP or a shift of
work alters people’s ability to discriminate the neutral low back sitting posture.

Methods: Sixty one subjects with, and forty subjects without, a history of LBP were recruited. Each subject’s spinal position sense was assessed before and after a shift of work by an electro-goniometer placed over the lumbar sacral spine. Subjects were blindfolded and instructed to actively locate the neutral low back sitting posture – the "test" position. They were then asked to flex or extend their low back and stop at a random position for 3 seconds, before returning to the neutral low back sitting position; the position they returned to was the "reproduced" position. This procedure was repeated 20 times in total. The absolute error between the "test" position and each "reproduced" position was calculated in degrees. The average mean error was then calculated and compared between the two groups using an independent-samples t test.

Results: Data was not normally distributed and therefore log-transformed before analysis. Anti-logged (returning data to original scale) values are also presented. LBP subjects had slightly higher average mean error values before work, showing that they found it more difficult than NLBP subjects to discriminate the neutral low back sitting posture, but the difference was nonsignificant.

Conclusions: The ability of people with and without LBP to appreciate the neutral low back sitting posture was similar, both before and after a shift of work.
pain
1462-0324
i159
Phillips, D.R.
5d994246-fe78-4fa1-a6be-71eb3037e27b
Hurley, M.V.
72d5de55-c2ec-40b4-87cf-89110330e66e
Mullee, M.
fd3f91c3-5e95-4f56-8d73-260824eeb362
Phillips, D.R.
5d994246-fe78-4fa1-a6be-71eb3037e27b
Hurley, M.V.
72d5de55-c2ec-40b4-87cf-89110330e66e
Mullee, M.
fd3f91c3-5e95-4f56-8d73-260824eeb362

Phillips, D.R., Hurley, M.V. and Mullee, M. (2005) Discrimination of the neutral low back sitting posture in people with and without low back pain, before and after a shift of work. [in special issue: BSR Annual Meeting with the DGR 19–22 April 2005 and BHPR Spring Meeting with the DGR 20–22 April 2005] Rheumatology, 44, supplement 1, i159. (doi:10.1093/rheumatology/44.suppl_1.i158).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: The "neutral" lumbar posture is considered the position least likely to cause low back pain, with errors as little as 2° from the neutral spinal posture substantially decreasing the axial compressive load capacity of the spine. Accurate sensory feedback from, and activation of, appropriate trunk muscles is essential for appreciation and maintenance of the neutral spinal posture. If these muscles are dysfunctional due to low back pain and/or workrelated activity and fatigue, this might impair people’s ability to discriminate the neutral spinal posture. This study investigated whether LBP or a shift of
work alters people’s ability to discriminate the neutral low back sitting posture.

Methods: Sixty one subjects with, and forty subjects without, a history of LBP were recruited. Each subject’s spinal position sense was assessed before and after a shift of work by an electro-goniometer placed over the lumbar sacral spine. Subjects were blindfolded and instructed to actively locate the neutral low back sitting posture – the "test" position. They were then asked to flex or extend their low back and stop at a random position for 3 seconds, before returning to the neutral low back sitting position; the position they returned to was the "reproduced" position. This procedure was repeated 20 times in total. The absolute error between the "test" position and each "reproduced" position was calculated in degrees. The average mean error was then calculated and compared between the two groups using an independent-samples t test.

Results: Data was not normally distributed and therefore log-transformed before analysis. Anti-logged (returning data to original scale) values are also presented. LBP subjects had slightly higher average mean error values before work, showing that they found it more difficult than NLBP subjects to discriminate the neutral low back sitting posture, but the difference was nonsignificant.

Conclusions: The ability of people with and without LBP to appreciate the neutral low back sitting posture was similar, both before and after a shift of work.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: April 2005
Additional Information: Poster presentation
Keywords: pain

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 18006
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/18006
ISSN: 1462-0324
PURE UUID: 1e786e91-197f-4309-826e-5995fb651092

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 31 Jan 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 06:02

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: D.R. Phillips
Author: M.V. Hurley
Author: M. Mullee

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×