The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Sub-optimal study design has major impacts on landscape-scale inference

Sub-optimal study design has major impacts on landscape-scale inference
Sub-optimal study design has major impacts on landscape-scale inference
Landscape-scale processes (e.g. habitat loss) are major drivers of the global biodiversity crisis, but the complexity and size of landscapes makes study design at this scale difficult. However, the impact of statistical problems associated with sub-optimal study design on inferences drawn from landscape-scale studies is poorly understood. Here, we examine how three common statistical ‘pitfalls’ associated with sub-optimal study design – (1) using landscapes that overlap in space; (2) using only a portion of the potential range of the landscape predictor variable(s) of interest; (3) failing to account for correlations among landscape predictor variables – affect the inferred relationships between the abundances of six species of anurans and the amount of forest in the landscape using a large (n = 1141) empirical dataset from Wisconsin and Michigan, USA. We show that sub-optimal study design alone can be sufficient to cause a switch in the sign of the inferred relationship between a species response and landscape structure, and that using only a portion of the potential range of a predictor variable, and correlations between predictor variables, are particularly likely to affect inferences. Our results also provide the first evidence of a non-monotonic relationship between forest amount and gray treefrog abundance, and suggest that inconsistencies in the literature about the inferred relationships between anuran presence/abundance and forest amount in the Great Lakes basin are likely largely due to sampling design issues. Increased attention to study design is therefore necessary for the development of robust generalizations in landscape ecology
landscape ecology, habitat fragmentation, biodiversity, amphibian decline, experimental design, habitat loss
0006-3207
298-305
Eigenbrod, Felix
43efc6ae-b129-45a2-8a34-e489b5f05827
Hecnar, Stephen J.
04b4dda1-a62d-4321-b768-fecc27d74a20
Fahrig, Lenore
0b5abbaa-cfb8-437a-bf31-be3d4ad721e0
Eigenbrod, Felix
43efc6ae-b129-45a2-8a34-e489b5f05827
Hecnar, Stephen J.
04b4dda1-a62d-4321-b768-fecc27d74a20
Fahrig, Lenore
0b5abbaa-cfb8-437a-bf31-be3d4ad721e0

Eigenbrod, Felix, Hecnar, Stephen J. and Fahrig, Lenore (2011) Sub-optimal study design has major impacts on landscape-scale inference. Biological Conservation, 144 (1), 298-305. (doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2010.09.007).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Landscape-scale processes (e.g. habitat loss) are major drivers of the global biodiversity crisis, but the complexity and size of landscapes makes study design at this scale difficult. However, the impact of statistical problems associated with sub-optimal study design on inferences drawn from landscape-scale studies is poorly understood. Here, we examine how three common statistical ‘pitfalls’ associated with sub-optimal study design – (1) using landscapes that overlap in space; (2) using only a portion of the potential range of the landscape predictor variable(s) of interest; (3) failing to account for correlations among landscape predictor variables – affect the inferred relationships between the abundances of six species of anurans and the amount of forest in the landscape using a large (n = 1141) empirical dataset from Wisconsin and Michigan, USA. We show that sub-optimal study design alone can be sufficient to cause a switch in the sign of the inferred relationship between a species response and landscape structure, and that using only a portion of the potential range of a predictor variable, and correlations between predictor variables, are particularly likely to affect inferences. Our results also provide the first evidence of a non-monotonic relationship between forest amount and gray treefrog abundance, and suggest that inconsistencies in the literature about the inferred relationships between anuran presence/abundance and forest amount in the Great Lakes basin are likely largely due to sampling design issues. Increased attention to study design is therefore necessary for the development of robust generalizations in landscape ecology

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: January 2011
Keywords: landscape ecology, habitat fragmentation, biodiversity, amphibian decline, experimental design, habitat loss

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 181337
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/181337
ISSN: 0006-3207
PURE UUID: 5aa9612e-d754-4b27-aaa2-7575619e766d
ORCID for Felix Eigenbrod: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8982-824X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 18 Apr 2011 10:43
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:56

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Felix Eigenbrod ORCID iD
Author: Stephen J. Hecnar
Author: Lenore Fahrig

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×