The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Miscarriage risk for IVF pregnancies in poor responders to ovarian hyperstimulation

Miscarriage risk for IVF pregnancies in poor responders to ovarian hyperstimulation
Miscarriage risk for IVF pregnancies in poor responders to ovarian hyperstimulation
The increasing miscarriage rate with advancing female age is attributed to a decline in oocyte quality. A poor response to ovarian hypestimulation is often an expression of a decrease in oocyte quantity. Although oocyte quality and quantity both decrease as a result of ovarian ageing, it is unclear whether these two processes are related to each other. To investigate the relationship between oocyte quantity and quality, we compared miscarriage rates between IVF treated women with a poor and normal response, respectively. Data were studied from a retrospective nationwide cohort of Dutch women undergoing IVF treatment from 1983 to 1995. Women achieving an ongoing pregnancy after their first complete IVF cycle (n = 1468) were compared with those experiencing miscarriage (n = 357) with respect to their ovarian response. Logistic regression analysis showed a statistically significant association between poor response (fewer than four retrieved oocytes) and miscarriage (P = 0.001). Due to interaction, this association became stronger with increasing female age. Among women <36 years, miscarriage rates between poor and normal responders did not differ, whereas among women 36 years poor responders had a statistically significant increased miscarriage rate compared with normal responders (P = 0.001). These results support the hypothesis of a relationship between quantitative ovarian reserve and oocyte quality.

ivf, miscarriage, ovarian reserve, poor response, pregnancy loss
1472-6483
191-200
Haadsma, Maaike L.
d93a22ab-586c-4d2b-a03c-67c7af3700e4
Groen, Henk
43387c93-45ca-4ca8-82ca-980dff7c1533
Mooji, Thea M.
6695b40e-9102-4ce3-9627-33533cdf1e2e
Burger, Curt W.
daaeae9d-3742-466f-8ba7-fab5d4ec3105
Broekmans, Frank J.M.
2330bdbe-90ae-4e1a-9685-52313d89b41b
Lambalk, Cornelis B.
3f8745eb-9b1d-4b76-9355-afdb1cd7f130
van Leeuwen, Flora E.
89d7c75b-228f-4c71-828b-c92b5e5ae42e
Hoek, Annemiek
58e16868-0a35-4610-8fbc-64da6e0ce2e2
Schats, R
dfe7c28a-9cff-4d3a-b446-ef11fa777295
Macklon, N.S.
7db1f4fc-a9f6-431f-a1f2-297bb8c9fb7e
Laven, JS
3109d6eb-332c-4f9b-87c2-4114b957ab55
Jansen, CA
6d6fca63-7f57-4649-83ae-5c69af003dc8
Helmerhorst, FM
6ec2ece9-f517-4186-9407-5d51b72b24f5
Naaktgeboren, N
00fe0881-09c2-4328-bc4f-665074a40206
Cohlen, BJ
f812fc34-e8f7-4076-84ef-8a59e7a7ec6c
Braat, DD
ccb52abe-9431-494e-9052-05fa1946d468
Kremer, JA
d67f38a0-0d37-4579-9fbc-994370833119
Willemsen, WN
5bfa6193-7b13-409a-8f93-d9795e395c26
Bots, RS
690e4a8a-8f24-4e22-9d95-c1b467cf1ca2
Simons, AH
79567488-ccaa-42ec-90c1-79ceb31c2094
van de Veen, F
bac387a3-0017-407c-9a61-2c6baac2845d
Evers, JL
ce1d53c3-f74d-431f-b073-c764622c74c2
van Dop, PA
67b7c4ad-a759-47ee-b6a7-715f2811da57
macklon, None
3fba2cc1-97a7-4474-b269-2ee763bf0803
Haadsma, Maaike L.
d93a22ab-586c-4d2b-a03c-67c7af3700e4
Groen, Henk
43387c93-45ca-4ca8-82ca-980dff7c1533
Mooji, Thea M.
6695b40e-9102-4ce3-9627-33533cdf1e2e
Burger, Curt W.
daaeae9d-3742-466f-8ba7-fab5d4ec3105
Broekmans, Frank J.M.
2330bdbe-90ae-4e1a-9685-52313d89b41b
Lambalk, Cornelis B.
3f8745eb-9b1d-4b76-9355-afdb1cd7f130
van Leeuwen, Flora E.
89d7c75b-228f-4c71-828b-c92b5e5ae42e
Hoek, Annemiek
58e16868-0a35-4610-8fbc-64da6e0ce2e2
Schats, R
dfe7c28a-9cff-4d3a-b446-ef11fa777295
Macklon, N.S.
7db1f4fc-a9f6-431f-a1f2-297bb8c9fb7e
Laven, JS
3109d6eb-332c-4f9b-87c2-4114b957ab55
Jansen, CA
6d6fca63-7f57-4649-83ae-5c69af003dc8
Helmerhorst, FM
6ec2ece9-f517-4186-9407-5d51b72b24f5
Naaktgeboren, N
00fe0881-09c2-4328-bc4f-665074a40206
Cohlen, BJ
f812fc34-e8f7-4076-84ef-8a59e7a7ec6c
Braat, DD
ccb52abe-9431-494e-9052-05fa1946d468
Kremer, JA
d67f38a0-0d37-4579-9fbc-994370833119
Willemsen, WN
5bfa6193-7b13-409a-8f93-d9795e395c26
Bots, RS
690e4a8a-8f24-4e22-9d95-c1b467cf1ca2
Simons, AH
79567488-ccaa-42ec-90c1-79ceb31c2094
van de Veen, F
bac387a3-0017-407c-9a61-2c6baac2845d
Evers, JL
ce1d53c3-f74d-431f-b073-c764622c74c2
van Dop, PA
67b7c4ad-a759-47ee-b6a7-715f2811da57
macklon, None
3fba2cc1-97a7-4474-b269-2ee763bf0803

Haadsma, Maaike L., Groen, Henk, Mooji, Thea M., Burger, Curt W., Broekmans, Frank J.M., Lambalk, Cornelis B., van Leeuwen, Flora E., Hoek, Annemiek, Schats, R, Macklon, N.S., Laven, JS, Jansen, CA, Helmerhorst, FM, Naaktgeboren, N, Cohlen, BJ, Braat, DD, Kremer, JA, Willemsen, WN, Bots, RS, Simons, AH, van de Veen, F, Evers, JL, van Dop, PA and macklon, None (2010) Miscarriage risk for IVF pregnancies in poor responders to ovarian hyperstimulation. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 20 (2), 191-200. (doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.11.005). (PMID:20113957)

Record type: Article

Abstract

The increasing miscarriage rate with advancing female age is attributed to a decline in oocyte quality. A poor response to ovarian hypestimulation is often an expression of a decrease in oocyte quantity. Although oocyte quality and quantity both decrease as a result of ovarian ageing, it is unclear whether these two processes are related to each other. To investigate the relationship between oocyte quantity and quality, we compared miscarriage rates between IVF treated women with a poor and normal response, respectively. Data were studied from a retrospective nationwide cohort of Dutch women undergoing IVF treatment from 1983 to 1995. Women achieving an ongoing pregnancy after their first complete IVF cycle (n = 1468) were compared with those experiencing miscarriage (n = 357) with respect to their ovarian response. Logistic regression analysis showed a statistically significant association between poor response (fewer than four retrieved oocytes) and miscarriage (P = 0.001). Due to interaction, this association became stronger with increasing female age. Among women <36 years, miscarriage rates between poor and normal responders did not differ, whereas among women 36 years poor responders had a statistically significant increased miscarriage rate compared with normal responders (P = 0.001). These results support the hypothesis of a relationship between quantitative ovarian reserve and oocyte quality.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: February 2010
Keywords: ivf, miscarriage, ovarian reserve, poor response, pregnancy loss

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 185367
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/185367
ISSN: 1472-6483
PURE UUID: 6ad50a2c-9c59-4e8f-bd87-237bd33b0f83

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 May 2011 10:22
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 03:13

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Maaike L. Haadsma
Author: Henk Groen
Author: Thea M. Mooji
Author: Curt W. Burger
Author: Frank J.M. Broekmans
Author: Cornelis B. Lambalk
Author: Flora E. van Leeuwen
Author: Annemiek Hoek
Author: R Schats
Author: N.S. Macklon
Author: JS Laven
Author: CA Jansen
Author: FM Helmerhorst
Author: N Naaktgeboren
Author: BJ Cohlen
Author: DD Braat
Author: JA Kremer
Author: WN Willemsen
Author: RS Bots
Author: AH Simons
Author: F van de Veen
Author: JL Evers
Author: PA van Dop
Author: None macklon

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×