The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Peri-implantation glucocorticoid administration for assisted reproductive technology cycles

Peri-implantation glucocorticoid administration for assisted reproductive technology cycles
Peri-implantation glucocorticoid administration for assisted reproductive technology cycles
Background: In order to improve embryo implantation in in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles, the use of glucocorticoids has been advocated. It has been proposed that glucocorticoids may improve the intra-uterine environment by acting as immuno modulators to reduce the uterine NK cell count, normalise the cytokine expression profile in the endometrium and by suppression of endometrial inflammation.
Objectives: To investigate whether the administration of glucocorticoids around the time of implantation improves clinical outcomes in subfertile women undergoing IVF or ICSI, compared to no glucocorticoid administration.
Search strategy: The Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group's trials register (February 2006), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2006), MEDLINE (1966 to June 2006), EMBASE (1976 to June 2006), CINAHL (1982 to June 2006) and Science Direct (1966 to June 2006) were searched. Reference lists of relevant articles and relevant conference proceedings were also hand searched.

Selection criteria: All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) addressing the research question were included.

Data collection and analysis: Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility and quality of trials and extracted relevant data.

Main results: Thirteen studies (1759 couples) were included. Three studies reported live birth rate and these did not identify a significant difference after pooling the (preliminary) results (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.67 to 2.19). With regard to pregnancy rates, there was also no evidence that glucocorticoids improved clinical outcome (13 RCTs; OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.44). However, a subgroup analysis of 650 women undergoing IVF (6 RCTs) revealed a significantly higher pregnancy rate for women using glucocorticoids (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.13). There were no significant differences in adverse events, but these were poorly and inconsistently reported.

Authors' conclusions: Overall, there is no clear evidence that administration of peri-implantation glucocorticoids in ART cycles significantly improves clinical outcome. The use of glucocorticoids in women undergoing IVF (rather than ICSI) was associated with an improvement in pregnancy rates of borderline statistical significance. These findings are limited to the routine use of glucocorticoids and cannot be extrapolated to women with auto-antibodies, unexplained infertility or recurrent implantation failure. Further well designed randomised studies are required to elucidate the possible role of this therapy in well defined patient groups.
1469-493X
CD005996
Boomsma, Carolien M.
d5c20848-2432-47ce-b262-ad35407a64b9
Keay, Stephen D.
ae9b7a04-1307-4eba-a97d-6aa367ee1b79
Macklon, Nick S.
7db1f4fc-a9f6-431f-a1f2-297bb8c9fb7e
Boomsma, Carolien M.
d5c20848-2432-47ce-b262-ad35407a64b9
Keay, Stephen D.
ae9b7a04-1307-4eba-a97d-6aa367ee1b79
Macklon, Nick S.
7db1f4fc-a9f6-431f-a1f2-297bb8c9fb7e

Boomsma, Carolien M., Keay, Stephen D. and Macklon, Nick S. (2007) Peri-implantation glucocorticoid administration for assisted reproductive technology cycles. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (1), CD005996. (doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005996.pub2). (PMID:17253574)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: In order to improve embryo implantation in in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles, the use of glucocorticoids has been advocated. It has been proposed that glucocorticoids may improve the intra-uterine environment by acting as immuno modulators to reduce the uterine NK cell count, normalise the cytokine expression profile in the endometrium and by suppression of endometrial inflammation.
Objectives: To investigate whether the administration of glucocorticoids around the time of implantation improves clinical outcomes in subfertile women undergoing IVF or ICSI, compared to no glucocorticoid administration.
Search strategy: The Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group's trials register (February 2006), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2006), MEDLINE (1966 to June 2006), EMBASE (1976 to June 2006), CINAHL (1982 to June 2006) and Science Direct (1966 to June 2006) were searched. Reference lists of relevant articles and relevant conference proceedings were also hand searched.

Selection criteria: All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) addressing the research question were included.

Data collection and analysis: Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility and quality of trials and extracted relevant data.

Main results: Thirteen studies (1759 couples) were included. Three studies reported live birth rate and these did not identify a significant difference after pooling the (preliminary) results (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.67 to 2.19). With regard to pregnancy rates, there was also no evidence that glucocorticoids improved clinical outcome (13 RCTs; OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.44). However, a subgroup analysis of 650 women undergoing IVF (6 RCTs) revealed a significantly higher pregnancy rate for women using glucocorticoids (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.13). There were no significant differences in adverse events, but these were poorly and inconsistently reported.

Authors' conclusions: Overall, there is no clear evidence that administration of peri-implantation glucocorticoids in ART cycles significantly improves clinical outcome. The use of glucocorticoids in women undergoing IVF (rather than ICSI) was associated with an improvement in pregnancy rates of borderline statistical significance. These findings are limited to the routine use of glucocorticoids and cannot be extrapolated to women with auto-antibodies, unexplained infertility or recurrent implantation failure. Further well designed randomised studies are required to elucidate the possible role of this therapy in well defined patient groups.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 24 January 2007

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 185509
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/185509
ISSN: 1469-493X
PURE UUID: 99cf8bb7-ad9a-499e-aece-ad367e149191

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 May 2011 13:51
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 03:14

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Carolien M. Boomsma
Author: Stephen D. Keay
Author: Nick S. Macklon

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×