The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A comparison of verification in the temporal and cepstrum-transformed domains of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions for biometric identification

A comparison of verification in the temporal and cepstrum-transformed domains of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions for biometric identification
A comparison of verification in the temporal and cepstrum-transformed domains of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions for biometric identification
An investigation of methods for the use of Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions (TEOAE) as an identification biometric is described in this paper. The results build upon advances in the field of otoacoustics to show that otoacoustic emissions are clearly distinctive and, hence, can be utilized as an identification biometric. Three contending methods of analysis to calculate the Euclidean distance separating individuals are described which are: Interpretation of the area-under-the-curve information from the time series TEOAE data; A measurement of the distance between a TEOAE recording in the temporal domain and a user template based upon averaging prior recorded data; A measurement of the distance between a TEOAE recording transformed into the cepstral domain and a user template based upon averaging cepstral transformed prior recorded data. False acception and rejection rates are given for the above techniques when applied to sets of test data recorded from test groups. In this study the best performance has been achieved using an Euclidian distance analysis in the temporal domain, which has yielded a false accept rate (FAR) of 1.27% and a false rejection rate (FRR) of 0 when applied to a data set consisting of a total of 230 recordings from 23 different subjects.
biometric identification, otoacoustic emissions, ear, biometrics, security, identification, verification
1755-8301
246-264
Chambers, P.
acc1a1f9-dbc8-4d5e-8982-1843cb1beda7
Grabham, N.J.
00695728-6280-4d06-a943-29142f2547c9
Swabey, M.A.
8d671618-18b3-4015-94d0-54f391772f80
Lutman, M.E.
White, N.M.
c7be4c26-e419-4e5c-9420-09fc02e2ac9c
Chad, J.E.
d220e55e-3c13-4d1d-ae9a-1cfae8ccfbe1
Beeby, S.P.
ba565001-2812-4300-89f1-fe5a437ecb0d
Chambers, P.
acc1a1f9-dbc8-4d5e-8982-1843cb1beda7
Grabham, N.J.
00695728-6280-4d06-a943-29142f2547c9
Swabey, M.A.
8d671618-18b3-4015-94d0-54f391772f80
Lutman, M.E.
White, N.M.
c7be4c26-e419-4e5c-9420-09fc02e2ac9c
Chad, J.E.
d220e55e-3c13-4d1d-ae9a-1cfae8ccfbe1
Beeby, S.P.
ba565001-2812-4300-89f1-fe5a437ecb0d

Chambers, P., Grabham, N.J., Swabey, M.A., Lutman, M.E., White, N.M., Chad, J.E. and Beeby, S.P. (2011) A comparison of verification in the temporal and cepstrum-transformed domains of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions for biometric identification. International Journal of Biometrics, 3 (3), 246-264. (doi:10.1504/IJBM.2011.040818).

Record type: Article

Abstract

An investigation of methods for the use of Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions (TEOAE) as an identification biometric is described in this paper. The results build upon advances in the field of otoacoustics to show that otoacoustic emissions are clearly distinctive and, hence, can be utilized as an identification biometric. Three contending methods of analysis to calculate the Euclidean distance separating individuals are described which are: Interpretation of the area-under-the-curve information from the time series TEOAE data; A measurement of the distance between a TEOAE recording in the temporal domain and a user template based upon averaging prior recorded data; A measurement of the distance between a TEOAE recording transformed into the cepstral domain and a user template based upon averaging cepstral transformed prior recorded data. False acception and rejection rates are given for the above techniques when applied to sets of test data recorded from test groups. In this study the best performance has been achieved using an Euclidian distance analysis in the temporal domain, which has yielded a false accept rate (FAR) of 1.27% and a false rejection rate (FRR) of 0 when applied to a data set consisting of a total of 230 recordings from 23 different subjects.

Text
IJBM_3(3)_Paper_5.pdf - Version of Record
Download (1MB)

More information

Published date: 2011
Keywords: biometric identification, otoacoustic emissions, ear, biometrics, security, identification, verification
Organisations: Human Sciences Group

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 185575
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/185575
ISSN: 1755-8301
PURE UUID: 114a7821-5c38-434e-a34c-e657b158cb25
ORCID for N.J. Grabham: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-6385-0331
ORCID for N.M. White: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1532-6452
ORCID for J.E. Chad: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6442-4281
ORCID for S.P. Beeby: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0800-1759

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 May 2011 14:14
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 02:46

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: P. Chambers
Author: N.J. Grabham ORCID iD
Author: M.A. Swabey
Author: M.E. Lutman
Author: N.M. White ORCID iD
Author: J.E. Chad ORCID iD
Author: S.P. Beeby ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×