The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Is the Behavioural Inhibition System the core vulnerability for Cluster C personality disorders?

Is the Behavioural Inhibition System the core vulnerability for Cluster C personality disorders?
Is the Behavioural Inhibition System the core vulnerability for Cluster C personality disorders?
The aim of the present study was to determine if Behavioural Inhibition System (BIS) functioning, as described by Gray (Gray, J.A.C. (1982). The Neuropsychology of anxiety: an enquiry into the functions of the Septo-Hippocampal system. Oxford: Oxford University Press), would be a core vulnerability for cluster C personality disorders (PD), that is, if these patients would show a higher anxiety trait (i.e. in Gray's terms) than patients with other PD or without Axis II disorders. A total sample of 77 out-patients was assessed with the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire, Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Scales, Karolinska Scales of Personality, and the Structured-Interview for DSM-III-R Personality Disorders (SCID-II). Analyses were conducted considering the following groups: presence of cluster C personality disorder/s, presence of clusters A/B personality disorder/s, absence of personality disorder (non-PD). As a second step, cluster C and non-PD groups were also subdivided according to the presence/absence of anxiety or affective Axis I symptoms. Overall, results showed higher scores on anxiety trait-related scales in the cluster C group. However, only Somatic Anxiety, Psychasthenia and Sensitivity to Punishment scales (SP) clearly distinguished cluster C from each one of the other two groups. After a second analysis, only the Sensitivity to Punishment scale showed independence from Axis I status while discriminating between cluster C and non-PD patients. Results were similar when only behavioural items from the SP scale were considered. From these results we can conclude that a higher BIS functioning would differentiate cluster C personality disorders from patients with other PD or without PD, and that considering only the behavioural anxiety component in their assessment, a low Axis I influence is obtained.
anxiety, personality disorders, cluster c, behavioural inhibition system
0191-8869
349-359
Caseras, X.
0d600775-cb80-4b06-a6e9-03b231ff6a9a
Torrubia, R.
05c0ed5c-4744-4079-89b6-f38f5e6eb5d5
Farr, J.M.
2a1d201d-23b6-4f00-b11f-28e906ee9f43
Caseras, X.
0d600775-cb80-4b06-a6e9-03b231ff6a9a
Torrubia, R.
05c0ed5c-4744-4079-89b6-f38f5e6eb5d5
Farr, J.M.
2a1d201d-23b6-4f00-b11f-28e906ee9f43

Caseras, X., Torrubia, R. and Farr, J.M. (2001) Is the Behavioural Inhibition System the core vulnerability for Cluster C personality disorders? Personality and Individual Differences, 31 (3), 349-359. (doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00141-0).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to determine if Behavioural Inhibition System (BIS) functioning, as described by Gray (Gray, J.A.C. (1982). The Neuropsychology of anxiety: an enquiry into the functions of the Septo-Hippocampal system. Oxford: Oxford University Press), would be a core vulnerability for cluster C personality disorders (PD), that is, if these patients would show a higher anxiety trait (i.e. in Gray's terms) than patients with other PD or without Axis II disorders. A total sample of 77 out-patients was assessed with the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire, Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Scales, Karolinska Scales of Personality, and the Structured-Interview for DSM-III-R Personality Disorders (SCID-II). Analyses were conducted considering the following groups: presence of cluster C personality disorder/s, presence of clusters A/B personality disorder/s, absence of personality disorder (non-PD). As a second step, cluster C and non-PD groups were also subdivided according to the presence/absence of anxiety or affective Axis I symptoms. Overall, results showed higher scores on anxiety trait-related scales in the cluster C group. However, only Somatic Anxiety, Psychasthenia and Sensitivity to Punishment scales (SP) clearly distinguished cluster C from each one of the other two groups. After a second analysis, only the Sensitivity to Punishment scale showed independence from Axis I status while discriminating between cluster C and non-PD patients. Results were similar when only behavioural items from the SP scale were considered. From these results we can conclude that a higher BIS functioning would differentiate cluster C personality disorders from patients with other PD or without PD, and that considering only the behavioural anxiety component in their assessment, a low Axis I influence is obtained.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2001
Keywords: anxiety, personality disorders, cluster c, behavioural inhibition system

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 18654
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/18654
ISSN: 0191-8869
PURE UUID: 9d429ebf-03a2-41c0-9902-cd18c699e601

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 28 Nov 2005
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 06:06

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: X. Caseras
Author: R. Torrubia
Author: J.M. Farr

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×