The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Condom-use errors and problems: the neglected aspect of studies assessing condom effectiveness

Condom-use errors and problems: the neglected aspect of studies assessing condom effectiveness
Condom-use errors and problems: the neglected aspect of studies assessing condom effectiveness
Objective

To assess and compare condom-use errors and problems among condom-using university males and females.
Methods

A convenience sample of 260 undergraduates was utilized. Males (n=118) and females (n=142) reported using condoms in the past 3 months for at least one episode of sex (penis in the mouth, vagina, or rectum) with a partner of the other sex. A questionnaire assessed 15 errors and problems associated with condom use that could be observed or experienced by females as well as males.
Results

About 44% reported lack of condom availability. Errors that could contribute to failure included using sharp instruments to open condom packages (11%), storing condoms in wallets (19%), and not using a new condom when switching from one form of sex to another (83%). Thirty-eight percent reported that condoms were applied after sex had begun, and nearly 14% indicated they removed condoms before sex was concluded. Problems included loss of erection during condom application (15%) or during sex (10%). About 28% reported that condoms had either slipped off or broken. Nearly 19% perceived, at least once, that their condom problems necessitated the use of a new condom. Few differences were observed in errors and problems between males and females.
Conclusions

Findings suggest that condom-use errors and problems may be quite common and that assessment of errors and problems do not necessarily need to be gender specific. Findings also suggest that correcting “user failure” may represent an important challenge in the practice of preventive medicine.
0749-3797
367-370
Crosby, Richard
2801f68b-3b83-422a-9687-9bade8502cf9
Sanders, Stephanie
d0b73b10-848f-4bc4-a440-4eb32476298e
Yarber, William L
6d44e4bd-492e-4d9c-84a7-e499de8cfb6d
Graham, Cynthia A
ac400331-f231-4449-a69b-ec9a477224c8
Crosby, Richard
2801f68b-3b83-422a-9687-9bade8502cf9
Sanders, Stephanie
d0b73b10-848f-4bc4-a440-4eb32476298e
Yarber, William L
6d44e4bd-492e-4d9c-84a7-e499de8cfb6d
Graham, Cynthia A
ac400331-f231-4449-a69b-ec9a477224c8

Crosby, Richard, Sanders, Stephanie, Yarber, William L and Graham, Cynthia A (2003) Condom-use errors and problems: the neglected aspect of studies assessing condom effectiveness. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 24 (4), 367-370. (doi:10.1016/S0749-3797(03)00015-1).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective

To assess and compare condom-use errors and problems among condom-using university males and females.
Methods

A convenience sample of 260 undergraduates was utilized. Males (n=118) and females (n=142) reported using condoms in the past 3 months for at least one episode of sex (penis in the mouth, vagina, or rectum) with a partner of the other sex. A questionnaire assessed 15 errors and problems associated with condom use that could be observed or experienced by females as well as males.
Results

About 44% reported lack of condom availability. Errors that could contribute to failure included using sharp instruments to open condom packages (11%), storing condoms in wallets (19%), and not using a new condom when switching from one form of sex to another (83%). Thirty-eight percent reported that condoms were applied after sex had begun, and nearly 14% indicated they removed condoms before sex was concluded. Problems included loss of erection during condom application (15%) or during sex (10%). About 28% reported that condoms had either slipped off or broken. Nearly 19% perceived, at least once, that their condom problems necessitated the use of a new condom. Few differences were observed in errors and problems between males and females.
Conclusions

Findings suggest that condom-use errors and problems may be quite common and that assessment of errors and problems do not necessarily need to be gender specific. Findings also suggest that correcting “user failure” may represent an important challenge in the practice of preventive medicine.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2003
Organisations: Psychology

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 206975
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/206975
ISSN: 0749-3797
PURE UUID: afca24b3-9f12-4f69-b500-f92da09f93cf
ORCID for Cynthia A Graham: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7884-599X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 Jan 2012 16:38
Last modified: 21 Mar 2024 02:47

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Richard Crosby
Author: Stephanie Sanders
Author: William L Yarber

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×