The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Sonic to ultrasonic Q of sandstones and limestones: Laboratory measurements at in situ pressures

Sonic to ultrasonic Q of sandstones and limestones: Laboratory measurements at in situ pressures
Sonic to ultrasonic Q of sandstones and limestones: Laboratory measurements at in situ pressures
Laboratory measurements of the attenuation and velocity dispersion of compressional and shear waves at appropriate frequencies, pressures, and temperatures can aid interpretation of seismic and well-log surveys as well as indicate absorption mechanisms in rocks. Construction and calibration of resonant-bar equipment was used to measure velocities and attenuations of standing shear and extensional waves in copper-jacketed right cylinders of rocks (Formula in length, Formula in diameter) in the sonic frequency range and at differential pressures up to Formula. We also measured ultrasonic velocities and attenuations of compressional and shear waves in Formula-diameter samples of the rocks at identical pressures. Extensional-mode velocities determined from the resonant bar are systematically too low, yielding unreliable Poisson's ratios. Poisson's ratios determined from the ultrasonic data are frequency corrected and used to calculate thesonic-frequency compressional-wave velocities and attenuations from the shear- and extensional-mode data. We calculate the bulk-modulus loss. The accuracies of attenuation data (expressed as Formula, where Q is the quality factor) are Formula for compressional and shear waves at ultrasonic frequency, Formula for shear waves, and Formula for compressional waves at sonic frequency. Example sonic-frequency data show that the energy absorption in a limestone is small (Formula greater than 200 and stress independent) and is primarily due to poroelasticity, whereas that in the two sandstones is variable in magnitude (Formula ranges from less than 50 to greater than 300, at reservoir pressures) and arises from a combination of poroelasticity and viscoelasticity. A graph of compressional-wave attenuation versus compressional-wave velocity at reservoir pressures differentiates high-permeability (Formula, Formula) brine-saturated sandstones from low-permeability (Formula, Formula) sandstones and shales.
0016-8033
WA93-WA101
McCann, Clive
afadcf9b-2751-434a-99a9-6fdbb4d56575
Sothcott, Jeremy
71ab4088-7b13-46d6-9e28-67538a02d595
McCann, Clive
afadcf9b-2751-434a-99a9-6fdbb4d56575
Sothcott, Jeremy
71ab4088-7b13-46d6-9e28-67538a02d595

McCann, Clive and Sothcott, Jeremy (2009) Sonic to ultrasonic Q of sandstones and limestones: Laboratory measurements at in situ pressures. Geophysics, 74 (2), WA93-WA101. (doi:10.1190/1.3052112).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Laboratory measurements of the attenuation and velocity dispersion of compressional and shear waves at appropriate frequencies, pressures, and temperatures can aid interpretation of seismic and well-log surveys as well as indicate absorption mechanisms in rocks. Construction and calibration of resonant-bar equipment was used to measure velocities and attenuations of standing shear and extensional waves in copper-jacketed right cylinders of rocks (Formula in length, Formula in diameter) in the sonic frequency range and at differential pressures up to Formula. We also measured ultrasonic velocities and attenuations of compressional and shear waves in Formula-diameter samples of the rocks at identical pressures. Extensional-mode velocities determined from the resonant bar are systematically too low, yielding unreliable Poisson's ratios. Poisson's ratios determined from the ultrasonic data are frequency corrected and used to calculate thesonic-frequency compressional-wave velocities and attenuations from the shear- and extensional-mode data. We calculate the bulk-modulus loss. The accuracies of attenuation data (expressed as Formula, where Q is the quality factor) are Formula for compressional and shear waves at ultrasonic frequency, Formula for shear waves, and Formula for compressional waves at sonic frequency. Example sonic-frequency data show that the energy absorption in a limestone is small (Formula greater than 200 and stress independent) and is primarily due to poroelasticity, whereas that in the two sandstones is variable in magnitude (Formula ranges from less than 50 to greater than 300, at reservoir pressures) and arises from a combination of poroelasticity and viscoelasticity. A graph of compressional-wave attenuation versus compressional-wave velocity at reservoir pressures differentiates high-permeability (Formula, Formula) brine-saturated sandstones from low-permeability (Formula, Formula) sandstones and shales.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: March 2009
Organisations: Marine Geoscience

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 207401
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/207401
ISSN: 0016-8033
PURE UUID: ae969b55-aacd-4ef9-bd23-8af774f7f5ac

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Jan 2012 17:10
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 04:39

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Clive McCann
Author: Jeremy Sothcott

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×