The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The Decisions Regarding ADHD Management (DRAMa) Study: uncertainties and complexities in assessment, diagnosis, and treatment from the clinician's point of view

The Decisions Regarding ADHD Management (DRAMa) Study: uncertainties and complexities in assessment, diagnosis, and treatment from the clinician's point of view
The Decisions Regarding ADHD Management (DRAMa) Study: uncertainties and complexities in assessment, diagnosis, and treatment from the clinician's point of view
Background: clinical decision making is influenced by a range of factors and constitutes an inherently complex task. Here we present results from the Decisions Regarding ADHD Management (DRAMa) study in which we undertook a thematic analysis of clinicians’ experiences and attitudes to assessment, diagnosis and treatment of ADHD.

Methods: fifty prescribing child psychiatrists and paediatricians from Belgium and the UK took part in semi-structured interviews about their decisions regarding the assessment, diagnosis and treatment of ADHD. Interviews were transcribed and processed using thematic analysis and the principles of grounded theory.

Results: clinicians described the assessment and diagnostic process as inherently complicated and requiring time and experience to piece together the accounts of children made by multiple sources and through the use of varying information gathering techniques. Treatment decisions were viewed as a shared process between families, children, and the clinician. Published guidelines were viewed as vague, and few clinicians spoke about the use of symptom thresholds or specific impairment criteria. Furthermore, systematic or operationalised criteria to assess treatment outcomes were rarely used.

Conclusions: decision making in ADHD is regarded as a complicated, time consuming process which requires extensive use of clinical impression, and involves a partnership with parents. Clinicians want to separate biological from environmental causal factors to understand the level of impairment and the subsequent need for a diagnosis of ADHD. Clinical guidelines would benefit from revisions to take into account the real world complexities of clinical decision making for ADHD


1018-8827
Kovshoff, H.
82c321ee-d151-40c5-8dde-281af59f2142
Williams, Sarah
f98f47db-b1d6-42c2-b0eb-7c0cb9a981d0
Vrijens, May
f6327e12-080f-47df-b6e5-4d587abc0045
Danckaerts, Marina
e7e7618b-6dd0-4520-bf4e-865597928758
Thompson, Margaret
bfe8522c-b252-4771-8036-744e93357c67
Yardley, Lucy
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e
Hodgkins, Paul
9bfa108c-b193-418d-9f4b-51f09a1ac65a
Sonuga-Barke, Edmund J.S.
bc80bf95-6cf9-4c76-a09d-eaaf0b717635
Kovshoff, H.
82c321ee-d151-40c5-8dde-281af59f2142
Williams, Sarah
f98f47db-b1d6-42c2-b0eb-7c0cb9a981d0
Vrijens, May
f6327e12-080f-47df-b6e5-4d587abc0045
Danckaerts, Marina
e7e7618b-6dd0-4520-bf4e-865597928758
Thompson, Margaret
bfe8522c-b252-4771-8036-744e93357c67
Yardley, Lucy
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e
Hodgkins, Paul
9bfa108c-b193-418d-9f4b-51f09a1ac65a
Sonuga-Barke, Edmund J.S.
bc80bf95-6cf9-4c76-a09d-eaaf0b717635

Kovshoff, H., Williams, Sarah, Vrijens, May, Danckaerts, Marina, Thompson, Margaret, Yardley, Lucy, Hodgkins, Paul and Sonuga-Barke, Edmund J.S. (2012) The Decisions Regarding ADHD Management (DRAMa) Study: uncertainties and complexities in assessment, diagnosis, and treatment from the clinician's point of view. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. (doi:10.1007/s00787-011-0235-8).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: clinical decision making is influenced by a range of factors and constitutes an inherently complex task. Here we present results from the Decisions Regarding ADHD Management (DRAMa) study in which we undertook a thematic analysis of clinicians’ experiences and attitudes to assessment, diagnosis and treatment of ADHD.

Methods: fifty prescribing child psychiatrists and paediatricians from Belgium and the UK took part in semi-structured interviews about their decisions regarding the assessment, diagnosis and treatment of ADHD. Interviews were transcribed and processed using thematic analysis and the principles of grounded theory.

Results: clinicians described the assessment and diagnostic process as inherently complicated and requiring time and experience to piece together the accounts of children made by multiple sources and through the use of varying information gathering techniques. Treatment decisions were viewed as a shared process between families, children, and the clinician. Published guidelines were viewed as vague, and few clinicians spoke about the use of symptom thresholds or specific impairment criteria. Furthermore, systematic or operationalised criteria to assess treatment outcomes were rarely used.

Conclusions: decision making in ADHD is regarded as a complicated, time consuming process which requires extensive use of clinical impression, and involves a partnership with parents. Clinicians want to separate biological from environmental causal factors to understand the level of impairment and the subsequent need for a diagnosis of ADHD. Clinical guidelines would benefit from revisions to take into account the real world complexities of clinical decision making for ADHD


Text
DRAMa_Revisions_011111_Final.doc - Other
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (205kB)
Request a copy

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 2012
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences, Clinical Neuroscience

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 208055
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/208055
ISSN: 1018-8827
PURE UUID: 23e25f07-668e-4cc0-8405-df6bdde76297
ORCID for H. Kovshoff: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6041-0376
ORCID for Lucy Yardley: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3853-883X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Jan 2012 11:22
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:14

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: H. Kovshoff ORCID iD
Author: Sarah Williams
Author: May Vrijens
Author: Marina Danckaerts
Author: Margaret Thompson
Author: Lucy Yardley ORCID iD
Author: Paul Hodgkins
Author: Edmund J.S. Sonuga-Barke

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×