The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Influence of uni-condylar loading on the stresses and kinematics on a total knee joint replacement

Influence of uni-condylar loading on the stresses and kinematics on a total knee joint replacement
Influence of uni-condylar loading on the stresses and kinematics on a total knee joint replacement
Introduction: The stress distribution within the polyethylene component of a TKR is ultimately dependent on the kinematics of the replaced knee. In turn, the kinematics are dependent on the design of the implant, the relative alignment of the components and tensions of the surrounding soft tissues. Clinical fluoroscopy studies have shown that unicondylar loading occurs in a high proportion of replaced knees. However, the impact on the polyethylene stresses is unknown. The aim of this study was to examine the influence of unicondylar loading during a gait cycle on the predicted kinematics and stresses generated by a commercially available TKR. Methods: A 3D finite element model was developed using explicit FE. The femoral component the TKR was modelled as a rigid surface while the tibial insert was meshed using 4-noded solid elements with non-linear polyethylene properties. The flexion angle, axial force, A-P force and I-E torque were applied to the model as a function of the gait cycle and were similar to those used by a Stanmore knee simulator. The axial force is normally applied through the centre of the femoral component (load case 1). Unicondylar loading was simulated by displacing the action of the axial force medially, by 10 (load case 2)and 20mm (load case 3). The resulting kinematics (A-P translation and I-E rotation) and the internal stresses within the polyethylene liner are reported for each of the three load cases. . Results: When subjected to uniform bi-condylar loading (lc1), the peak anterior translation of the polyethylene component was approx. 3.5mm and the peak internal rotation was 6 degrees. The peak von Mises stresses was approx. 16 MPa. Shifting the axial load medially by 10mm only had a minor effect on the predicted kinematics, increasing the anterior translation by 1mm and the internal rotation by 1 degree. The peak polyethylene stresses increased to 18 MPa. Shifting the axial load medially by 20mm had a significant effect on both the kinematics and stresses. The maximum anterior translation of the polyethylene increased to 8mm and there was an associated increase in the peak internal rotation, from 6 degrees to 20 degrees. The peak polyethylene stresses increased to approx. 20 MPa and significant amounts of plastic deformation were induced during the stance phase of the gait cycle. Discussion and conclusions: Explicit finite element analysis has for the first time enabled us to simulate the abnormal kinematics caused by unicondylar loading and the associated changes in the polyethylene stresses. For the particular design examined, uneven bicondylar loading (lc2) had a minor affect on the kinematics but did increases the polyethylene stresses. Unicondylar loading (lc3) significantly affected both the kinematics and the polyethylene stresses.
Taylor, M.
e368bda3-6ca5-4178-80e9-41a689badeeb
Barrett, D.S.
cbaaf354-cc75-42d4-980c-0a8797db5b4c
Taylor, M.
e368bda3-6ca5-4178-80e9-41a689badeeb
Barrett, D.S.
cbaaf354-cc75-42d4-980c-0a8797db5b4c

Taylor, M. and Barrett, D.S. (2001) Influence of uni-condylar loading on the stresses and kinematics on a total knee joint replacement. International Society of Biomechanics XVIIIth Congress, Zurich, Switzerland. 07 - 12 Jul 2001.

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Other)

Abstract

Introduction: The stress distribution within the polyethylene component of a TKR is ultimately dependent on the kinematics of the replaced knee. In turn, the kinematics are dependent on the design of the implant, the relative alignment of the components and tensions of the surrounding soft tissues. Clinical fluoroscopy studies have shown that unicondylar loading occurs in a high proportion of replaced knees. However, the impact on the polyethylene stresses is unknown. The aim of this study was to examine the influence of unicondylar loading during a gait cycle on the predicted kinematics and stresses generated by a commercially available TKR. Methods: A 3D finite element model was developed using explicit FE. The femoral component the TKR was modelled as a rigid surface while the tibial insert was meshed using 4-noded solid elements with non-linear polyethylene properties. The flexion angle, axial force, A-P force and I-E torque were applied to the model as a function of the gait cycle and were similar to those used by a Stanmore knee simulator. The axial force is normally applied through the centre of the femoral component (load case 1). Unicondylar loading was simulated by displacing the action of the axial force medially, by 10 (load case 2)and 20mm (load case 3). The resulting kinematics (A-P translation and I-E rotation) and the internal stresses within the polyethylene liner are reported for each of the three load cases. . Results: When subjected to uniform bi-condylar loading (lc1), the peak anterior translation of the polyethylene component was approx. 3.5mm and the peak internal rotation was 6 degrees. The peak von Mises stresses was approx. 16 MPa. Shifting the axial load medially by 10mm only had a minor effect on the predicted kinematics, increasing the anterior translation by 1mm and the internal rotation by 1 degree. The peak polyethylene stresses increased to 18 MPa. Shifting the axial load medially by 20mm had a significant effect on both the kinematics and stresses. The maximum anterior translation of the polyethylene increased to 8mm and there was an associated increase in the peak internal rotation, from 6 degrees to 20 degrees. The peak polyethylene stresses increased to approx. 20 MPa and significant amounts of plastic deformation were induced during the stance phase of the gait cycle. Discussion and conclusions: Explicit finite element analysis has for the first time enabled us to simulate the abnormal kinematics caused by unicondylar loading and the associated changes in the polyethylene stresses. For the particular design examined, uneven bicondylar loading (lc2) had a minor affect on the kinematics but did increases the polyethylene stresses. Unicondylar loading (lc3) significantly affected both the kinematics and the polyethylene stresses.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2001
Venue - Dates: International Society of Biomechanics XVIIIth Congress, Zurich, Switzerland, 2001-07-07 - 2001-07-12

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 21809
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/21809
PURE UUID: 5db3f621-61ab-4431-b386-343055a09dc0

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 27 Feb 2007
Last modified: 11 Dec 2021 14:33

Export record

Contributors

Author: M. Taylor
Author: D.S. Barrett

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×