The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Impact of ergonomic intervention on back pain among nurses

Impact of ergonomic intervention on back pain among nurses
Impact of ergonomic intervention on back pain among nurses
Objectives: This study assessed the impact of ergonomic intervention on rates of low-back pain among hospital nurses.
Methods: Altogether 1239 female nurses from two hospitals in southern England completed a baseline postal questionnaire about low-back pain and associated risk factors. Between 18 and 28 months after the baseline survey, major intervention was implemented at one hospital to minimize unassisted patient handling and high-risk nursing tasks. At the other, no intervention was initiated, and efforts to improve patient handling were more limited. Thirty-two months after the baseline survey, a second postal survey was carried out in both hospitals (1167 respondents) to reassess the prevalence of symptoms and risk factors.
Results: After adjustment for nonoccupational risk factors, prevalent low-back pain at baseline was associated with low job satisfaction and the performance of patient-handling activities without mechanical aids. After the intervention, the prevalence of occupational risk factors was somewhat lower, but similar improvements occurred at the comparison hospital. At the intervention site the prevalence of symptoms increased slightly (from 27% to 30%), whereas at the comparison site there was no change, the prevalence remaining constant at 27%. Calculations based on the association of risk factors with symptoms at baseline and the observed changes in their prevalence indicated that the change in risk factors was insufficient to produce a substantial reduction in back pain.
Conclusions: These findings cast doubt on the means by which many hospitals are attempting to improve the ergonomics of nursing activities. More effective methods of implementing changes in work systems are needed.
health personnel, in-service training, lifting, low-back pain, occupational health, patient handling
0355-3140
117-123
Smedley, J.
93ab0e57-e127-4367-a8b6-4814177e1f39
Trevelyan, F.
18b93b76-e477-4f10-b169-02dea9ee784e
Inskip, H.
5fb4470a-9379-49b2-a533-9da8e61058b7
Buckle, P.
2622f3e1-c381-4001-a35f-7fbd55cc30e9
Cooper, C.
e05f5612-b493-4273-9b71-9e0ce32bdad6
Coggon, D.
2b43ce0a-cc61-4d86-b15d-794208ffa5d3
Smedley, J.
93ab0e57-e127-4367-a8b6-4814177e1f39
Trevelyan, F.
18b93b76-e477-4f10-b169-02dea9ee784e
Inskip, H.
5fb4470a-9379-49b2-a533-9da8e61058b7
Buckle, P.
2622f3e1-c381-4001-a35f-7fbd55cc30e9
Cooper, C.
e05f5612-b493-4273-9b71-9e0ce32bdad6
Coggon, D.
2b43ce0a-cc61-4d86-b15d-794208ffa5d3

Smedley, J., Trevelyan, F., Inskip, H., Buckle, P., Cooper, C. and Coggon, D. (2003) Impact of ergonomic intervention on back pain among nurses. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 29 (2), 117-123.

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives: This study assessed the impact of ergonomic intervention on rates of low-back pain among hospital nurses.
Methods: Altogether 1239 female nurses from two hospitals in southern England completed a baseline postal questionnaire about low-back pain and associated risk factors. Between 18 and 28 months after the baseline survey, major intervention was implemented at one hospital to minimize unassisted patient handling and high-risk nursing tasks. At the other, no intervention was initiated, and efforts to improve patient handling were more limited. Thirty-two months after the baseline survey, a second postal survey was carried out in both hospitals (1167 respondents) to reassess the prevalence of symptoms and risk factors.
Results: After adjustment for nonoccupational risk factors, prevalent low-back pain at baseline was associated with low job satisfaction and the performance of patient-handling activities without mechanical aids. After the intervention, the prevalence of occupational risk factors was somewhat lower, but similar improvements occurred at the comparison hospital. At the intervention site the prevalence of symptoms increased slightly (from 27% to 30%), whereas at the comparison site there was no change, the prevalence remaining constant at 27%. Calculations based on the association of risk factors with symptoms at baseline and the observed changes in their prevalence indicated that the change in risk factors was insufficient to produce a substantial reduction in back pain.
Conclusions: These findings cast doubt on the means by which many hospitals are attempting to improve the ergonomics of nursing activities. More effective methods of implementing changes in work systems are needed.

Text
24509.pdf - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Published date: 2003
Keywords: health personnel, in-service training, lifting, low-back pain, occupational health, patient handling

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 24509
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/24509
ISSN: 0355-3140
PURE UUID: 567e3e92-4ead-466d-8141-33cda5ebb6c3
ORCID for H. Inskip: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8897-1749
ORCID for C. Cooper: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3510-0709
ORCID for D. Coggon: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1930-3987

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 31 Mar 2006
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 02:44

Export record

Contributors

Author: J. Smedley
Author: F. Trevelyan
Author: H. Inskip ORCID iD
Author: P. Buckle
Author: C. Cooper ORCID iD
Author: D. Coggon ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×