The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Identifying Communities of Practice through Ontology Network Analysis

Identifying Communities of Practice through Ontology Network Analysis
Identifying Communities of Practice through Ontology Network Analysis
Communities of practice—groups of individuals interested in a particular job, procedure, or work domain—informally swap insights on work-related tasks, often through quick chats by the water cooler. They act as corporate memories, transfer best practice, provide mechanisms for situated learning, and act as foci for innovation.1,2 Increasingly, organizations are harnessing communities of practice to carry out important knowledge management functions.3 However, a significant first step is identifying the community, which often doesn’t designate itself as such, and its members, who don’t know they belong! So, this step involves determining which people in a community of practice have common interests in particular practices or functions and producing sets or clusters of related individuals. Community identification traditionally demands heavy resources and often includes extensive interviewing. In this article, we describe Ontocopi (Ontology-Based Community of Practice Identifier), a tool to help identify communities. Ontocopi lets you infer the informal relations that define a community of practice from the presence of more formal relations. For instance, if A and B have no formal relation but they have both authored papers with C (formal relation), they might share interests (informal relation). Because Ontocopi works in this way, we cannot claim without qualification that it identifies communities of practice. Significant informal relations might have little or no connection to the formal ones. Here, we refer to the networks uncovered by Ontocopi as COPs and to informal social networks as communities of practice. We work under the assumption that COPs are sometimes decent proxies for communities of practice.
1541-1672
18-25
Alani, Harith
70cdbdce-1494-44c2-9dae-65d82bf7e991
Dasmahapatra, Srinandan
eb5fd76f-4335-4ae9-a88a-20b9e2b3f698
O'Hara, Kieron
0a64a4b1-efb5-45d1-a4c2-77783f18f0c4
Shadbolt, Nigel
5c5acdf4-ad42-49b6-81fe-e9db58c2caf7
Alani, Harith
70cdbdce-1494-44c2-9dae-65d82bf7e991
Dasmahapatra, Srinandan
eb5fd76f-4335-4ae9-a88a-20b9e2b3f698
O'Hara, Kieron
0a64a4b1-efb5-45d1-a4c2-77783f18f0c4
Shadbolt, Nigel
5c5acdf4-ad42-49b6-81fe-e9db58c2caf7

Alani, Harith, Dasmahapatra, Srinandan, O'Hara, Kieron and Shadbolt, Nigel (2003) Identifying Communities of Practice through Ontology Network Analysis. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 18 (2), 18-25.

Record type: Article

Abstract

Communities of practice—groups of individuals interested in a particular job, procedure, or work domain—informally swap insights on work-related tasks, often through quick chats by the water cooler. They act as corporate memories, transfer best practice, provide mechanisms for situated learning, and act as foci for innovation.1,2 Increasingly, organizations are harnessing communities of practice to carry out important knowledge management functions.3 However, a significant first step is identifying the community, which often doesn’t designate itself as such, and its members, who don’t know they belong! So, this step involves determining which people in a community of practice have common interests in particular practices or functions and producing sets or clusters of related individuals. Community identification traditionally demands heavy resources and often includes extensive interviewing. In this article, we describe Ontocopi (Ontology-Based Community of Practice Identifier), a tool to help identify communities. Ontocopi lets you infer the informal relations that define a community of practice from the presence of more formal relations. For instance, if A and B have no formal relation but they have both authored papers with C (formal relation), they might share interests (informal relation). Because Ontocopi works in this way, we cannot claim without qualification that it identifies communities of practice. Significant informal relations might have little or no connection to the formal ones. Here, we refer to the networks uncovered by Ontocopi as COPs and to informal social networks as communities of practice. We work under the assumption that COPs are sometimes decent proxies for communities of practice.

Text
x2alani.lo.pdf - Other
Download (1MB)

More information

Published date: March 2003
Organisations: Web & Internet Science, Southampton Wireless Group

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 257397
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/257397
ISSN: 1541-1672
PURE UUID: 31171d9c-c839-4e0a-97ae-4aad323097a3
ORCID for Kieron O'Hara: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9051-4456

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 14 Apr 2003
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:09

Export record

Contributors

Author: Harith Alani
Author: Srinandan Dasmahapatra
Author: Kieron O'Hara ORCID iD
Author: Nigel Shadbolt

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×