The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Evidence based case report. Advice about mammography for a young woman with a family history of breast cancer

Evidence based case report. Advice about mammography for a young woman with a family history of breast cancer
Evidence based case report. Advice about mammography for a young woman with a family history of breast cancer
A 35 year old woman with a family history of breast cancer was in need of advice. Her two sisters, aged 34 and 38, were healthy and not affected, but her mother had developed breast cancer at the age of 48, and her mother's paternal aunt had developed it at 39 (figure). The sisters lived in different parts of the United Kingdom. Her elder sister had been told that this family history was not important and that she would not need any screening until she was eligible for the national screening programme, whereas her younger sister had already had a mammogram and been told that she should have these yearly from the age of 35. The patient was confused and asked her general practitioner whether she should have mammography. The general practitioner wrote to the local genetics service for advice.
0959-8138
1040-1042
Lucassen, Anneke
3f282fe4-b839-443c-8c81-6b8a507153c7
Watson, Elia
6f4b012e-e10e-4d76-a7cd-086c996e96ab
Eccles, Diana
5b59bc73-11c9-4cf0-a9d5-7a8e523eee23
Lucassen, Anneke
3f282fe4-b839-443c-8c81-6b8a507153c7
Watson, Elia
6f4b012e-e10e-4d76-a7cd-086c996e96ab
Eccles, Diana
5b59bc73-11c9-4cf0-a9d5-7a8e523eee23

Lucassen, Anneke, Watson, Elia and Eccles, Diana (2001) Evidence based case report. Advice about mammography for a young woman with a family history of breast cancer. BMJ, 322 (7293), 1040-1042.

Record type: Article

Abstract

A 35 year old woman with a family history of breast cancer was in need of advice. Her two sisters, aged 34 and 38, were healthy and not affected, but her mother had developed breast cancer at the age of 48, and her mother's paternal aunt had developed it at 39 (figure). The sisters lived in different parts of the United Kingdom. Her elder sister had been told that this family history was not important and that she would not need any screening until she was eligible for the national screening programme, whereas her younger sister had already had a mammogram and been told that she should have these yearly from the age of 35. The patient was confused and asked her general practitioner whether she should have mammography. The general practitioner wrote to the local genetics service for advice.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2001

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 26444
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/26444
ISSN: 0959-8138
PURE UUID: 7735c06b-41f1-44a5-bdbe-108a3d6f1d08
ORCID for Diana Eccles: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9935-3169

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 24 Apr 2006
Last modified: 23 Jul 2022 01:34

Export record

Contributors

Author: Anneke Lucassen
Author: Elia Watson
Author: Diana Eccles ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×