The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Institutional versus Central Deposit Optimising DRIVER Policy for the OA Mandate and Metric Era

Institutional versus Central Deposit Optimising DRIVER Policy for the OA Mandate and Metric Era
Institutional versus Central Deposit Optimising DRIVER Policy for the OA Mandate and Metric Era
Funder central deposit mandates (like NIH) do not scale They cannot systematically cover all of research output Not all research is funded But all research originates from a university or research institution Disciplines criss-cross research space, arbitrarily and redundantly Researchers have multiple funders, publish in multiple disciplines Institutions systematically cover all of research space, in all disciplines All OA repositories are interoperable Hence both funders and institutions should mandate institutional deposit Then the deposits can be harvested centrally wherever else desired DEPOSIT INSTITUTIONALLY HARVEST CENTRALLY
institutional repositories, open access, central vs institutional deposit, mandates, metrics, self-archiving
Harnad, Stevan
442ee520-71a1-4283-8e01-106693487d8b
Harnad, Stevan
442ee520-71a1-4283-8e01-106693487d8b

Harnad, Stevan (2008) Institutional versus Central Deposit Optimising DRIVER Policy for the OA Mandate and Metric Era. European Network for the Advancement of Artificial Cognitive Systems, Workshop on Social Cognition,, Goettingen, Germany. 16 - 17 Jan 2008. (In Press)

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Other)

Abstract

Funder central deposit mandates (like NIH) do not scale They cannot systematically cover all of research output Not all research is funded But all research originates from a university or research institution Disciplines criss-cross research space, arbitrarily and redundantly Researchers have multiple funders, publish in multiple disciplines Institutions systematically cover all of research space, in all disciplines All OA repositories are interoperable Hence both funders and institutions should mandate institutional deposit Then the deposits can be harvested centrally wherever else desired DEPOSIT INSTITUTIONALLY HARVEST CENTRALLY

Video
harnad-driver.mov - Other
Available under License Other.
Download (24MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 10 January 2008
Additional Information: Invited Keynote Speaker, First DRIVER Summit, Goettingen, Germany, 16-17 January 2008 http://www.driver-support.eu/multi/DRIVERSummit.php Event Dates: 16-17 January 2008
Venue - Dates: European Network for the Advancement of Artificial Cognitive Systems, Workshop on Social Cognition,, Goettingen, Germany, 2008-01-16 - 2008-01-17
Keywords: institutional repositories, open access, central vs institutional deposit, mandates, metrics, self-archiving
Organisations: Web & Internet Science

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 265696
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/265696
PURE UUID: c0cee783-c623-4c5a-846a-2918ab71f364
ORCID for Stevan Harnad: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6153-1129

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 May 2008 00:55
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 02:48

Export record

Contributors

Author: Stevan Harnad ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×