The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Intravenous salbutamol bolus compared with an aminophylline infusion in children with severe asthma: a randomised controlled trial

Intravenous salbutamol bolus compared with an aminophylline infusion in children with severe asthma: a randomised controlled trial
Intravenous salbutamol bolus compared with an aminophylline infusion in children with severe asthma: a randomised controlled trial
Background: The relative efficacies of aminophylline and salbutamol in severe acute childhood asthma are currently unclear. A single bolus of salbutamol was compared with a continuous aminophylline infusion in children with severe asthma in a randomised double blind study.
Methods: Children aged 1–16 years with acute severe asthma were enrolled if they showed little improvement with three nebulisers (combined salbutamol and ipratropium) administered over an hour and systemic steroids. Subjects were randomised to receive either a short intravenous bolus of salbutamol (15 µg/kg over 20 minutes) followed by a saline infusion or an aminophylline infusion (5 mg/kg over 20 minutes) followed by 0.9 mg/kg/h.
Results: Forty four subjects were enrolled, with 18 randomly allocated to receive salbutamol and 26 to receive aminophylline. The groups were well matched at baseline. An intention to treat analysis showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the asthma severity score (ASS) at 2 hours between the two groups (median (IQR) 6 (6, 8) and 6.5 (5, 8) for salbutamol and aminophylline respectively, p=0.93). A similar improvement in ASS to 2 hours was seen in the two groups (mean difference –0.08, 95% CI –0.97 to 0.80), there was a trend (p=0.07) towards a longer duration of oxygen therapy in the salbutamol group (17.8 hours (95% CI 8.5 to 37.5) v 7.0 hours (95% CI 3.4 to 14.2)), and a significantly (p=0.02) longer length of hospital stay in the salbutamol group (85.4 (95% CI 66.1 to 110.2) hours v 57.3 hours (95% CI 45.6 to 72.0)). There was no significant difference in adverse events between the two groups.
Conclusions: This study suggests that, in severe childhood asthma, there is no significant difference in the effectiveness of a bolus of salbutamol and an aminophylline infusion in the first 2 hours of treatment. Overall, the aminophylline infusion was superior as it significantly reduced the length of stay in hospital.
asthma, children, salbutamol, aminophylline
0040-6376
306-310
Roberts, G.
ea00db4e-84e7-4b39-8273-9b71dbd7e2f3
Newsom, D.
219ee710-307e-4066-a6da-b4c7ea3c2af7
Gomez, K.
227b1eee-118d-461f-b696-528730ed3ccc
Raffles, A.
958f7315-6298-4a9a-8b89-3ced578c5bdc
Saglani, S.
c7ed5ed6-76d5-4bea-94e3-15f41765e168
Begent, J.
9cf3cd8a-2424-4530-a0c6-1236702e756a
Lachman, P.
ee1378e1-78ab-43bd-8663-75360a59c98d
Sloper, K.
baac965e-801f-49eb-b9c5-172911ec1636
Buchdahl, R.
464f8614-51f2-4820-8411-671da630e259
Habel, A.
0ca9e71e-e9a6-46bd-93b5-bba81d805c9b
Roberts, G.
ea00db4e-84e7-4b39-8273-9b71dbd7e2f3
Newsom, D.
219ee710-307e-4066-a6da-b4c7ea3c2af7
Gomez, K.
227b1eee-118d-461f-b696-528730ed3ccc
Raffles, A.
958f7315-6298-4a9a-8b89-3ced578c5bdc
Saglani, S.
c7ed5ed6-76d5-4bea-94e3-15f41765e168
Begent, J.
9cf3cd8a-2424-4530-a0c6-1236702e756a
Lachman, P.
ee1378e1-78ab-43bd-8663-75360a59c98d
Sloper, K.
baac965e-801f-49eb-b9c5-172911ec1636
Buchdahl, R.
464f8614-51f2-4820-8411-671da630e259
Habel, A.
0ca9e71e-e9a6-46bd-93b5-bba81d805c9b

Roberts, G., Newsom, D., Gomez, K., Raffles, A., Saglani, S., Begent, J., Lachman, P., Sloper, K., Buchdahl, R. and Habel, A. (2003) Intravenous salbutamol bolus compared with an aminophylline infusion in children with severe asthma: a randomised controlled trial. Thorax, 58 (4), 306-310.

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: The relative efficacies of aminophylline and salbutamol in severe acute childhood asthma are currently unclear. A single bolus of salbutamol was compared with a continuous aminophylline infusion in children with severe asthma in a randomised double blind study.
Methods: Children aged 1–16 years with acute severe asthma were enrolled if they showed little improvement with three nebulisers (combined salbutamol and ipratropium) administered over an hour and systemic steroids. Subjects were randomised to receive either a short intravenous bolus of salbutamol (15 µg/kg over 20 minutes) followed by a saline infusion or an aminophylline infusion (5 mg/kg over 20 minutes) followed by 0.9 mg/kg/h.
Results: Forty four subjects were enrolled, with 18 randomly allocated to receive salbutamol and 26 to receive aminophylline. The groups were well matched at baseline. An intention to treat analysis showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the asthma severity score (ASS) at 2 hours between the two groups (median (IQR) 6 (6, 8) and 6.5 (5, 8) for salbutamol and aminophylline respectively, p=0.93). A similar improvement in ASS to 2 hours was seen in the two groups (mean difference –0.08, 95% CI –0.97 to 0.80), there was a trend (p=0.07) towards a longer duration of oxygen therapy in the salbutamol group (17.8 hours (95% CI 8.5 to 37.5) v 7.0 hours (95% CI 3.4 to 14.2)), and a significantly (p=0.02) longer length of hospital stay in the salbutamol group (85.4 (95% CI 66.1 to 110.2) hours v 57.3 hours (95% CI 45.6 to 72.0)). There was no significant difference in adverse events between the two groups.
Conclusions: This study suggests that, in severe childhood asthma, there is no significant difference in the effectiveness of a bolus of salbutamol and an aminophylline infusion in the first 2 hours of treatment. Overall, the aminophylline infusion was superior as it significantly reduced the length of stay in hospital.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2003
Keywords: asthma, children, salbutamol, aminophylline

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 27375
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/27375
ISSN: 0040-6376
PURE UUID: 7a46ba6f-c6c0-453e-92c5-ef211d3da6db
ORCID for G. Roberts: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2252-1248

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 24 Apr 2006
Last modified: 09 Jan 2022 03:18

Export record

Contributors

Author: G. Roberts ORCID iD
Author: D. Newsom
Author: K. Gomez
Author: A. Raffles
Author: S. Saglani
Author: J. Begent
Author: P. Lachman
Author: K. Sloper
Author: R. Buchdahl
Author: A. Habel

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×