The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Robustness of balanced incomplete block designs to randomly missing observations

Robustness of balanced incomplete block designs to randomly missing observations
Robustness of balanced incomplete block designs to randomly missing observations
Practical experimenters must always be aware of the possibility that some of their observations could become unavailable for analysis. In an experiment involving treatments and blocks, it could be desirable to select a design that is resistant to the loss of a complete block or treatment, or a small number of observations distributed at random throughout the initial design. In this paper, we examine the robustness of binary, variance-balanced, incomplete block designs using the eigenvalues of the associated information matrix when specific observations are missing. Results are presented for up to three missing observations and the procedure is illustrated using an example involving eight treatments arranged in 14 blocks of four treatments per block. On the basis of these considerations, it is recommended that, to guard against a substantial loss of efficiency due to a small number of randomly missing observations, it is preferable to use designs with as few treatments common to pairs of blocks as possible.
balanced incomplete block design, missing observations, information matrix, eigenvalues, variance of treatment differences
0378-3758
283-296
Prescott, Philip
cf0adfdd-989b-4f15-9e60-ef85eed817b2
Mansson, Ralph
9788f5c4-af4d-4cc5-94bc-a4922d637a5a
Prescott, Philip
cf0adfdd-989b-4f15-9e60-ef85eed817b2
Mansson, Ralph
9788f5c4-af4d-4cc5-94bc-a4922d637a5a

Prescott, Philip and Mansson, Ralph (2001) Robustness of balanced incomplete block designs to randomly missing observations. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 92 (1-2), 283-296. (doi:10.1016/S0378-3758(00)00147-6).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Practical experimenters must always be aware of the possibility that some of their observations could become unavailable for analysis. In an experiment involving treatments and blocks, it could be desirable to select a design that is resistant to the loss of a complete block or treatment, or a small number of observations distributed at random throughout the initial design. In this paper, we examine the robustness of binary, variance-balanced, incomplete block designs using the eigenvalues of the associated information matrix when specific observations are missing. Results are presented for up to three missing observations and the procedure is illustrated using an example involving eight treatments arranged in 14 blocks of four treatments per block. On the basis of these considerations, it is recommended that, to guard against a substantial loss of efficiency due to a small number of randomly missing observations, it is preferable to use designs with as few treatments common to pairs of blocks as possible.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: January 2001
Keywords: balanced incomplete block design, missing observations, information matrix, eigenvalues, variance of treatment differences
Organisations: Statistics

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 29986
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/29986
ISSN: 0378-3758
PURE UUID: fc4be822-4739-46c4-b0cf-7f7d965766f4

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 May 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 07:36

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Philip Prescott
Author: Ralph Mansson

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×