The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A two-phase sampling scheme with applications to auditing or sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

A two-phase sampling scheme with applications to auditing or sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
A two-phase sampling scheme with applications to auditing or sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
External auditors such as the National Audit Office (NAO) are the final arbiters on the level of error in accounts presented to them by their clients, and the accuracy or otherwise of individual transactions. In coming to a view on the level of error, they are expected to carry out the audit effectively and efficiently, and therefore need to make the best possible use of all the information at their disposal, even when some of the information may not be totally accurate.
We consider the particular situation where the NAO is given access to the results of tests on a relatively large random sample of transactions, typically conducted by the client's internal auditors. A two-phase sampling scheme arises when the NAO subsequently assesses the quality of the client's data by retesting a subsample of these transactions. The paper discusses methodologies for combining the two sets of data to produce optimum estimates of the proportion of transactions in error (the error rate) and of the level of monetary error in the account. Although a maximum likelihood approach yields a relatively straightforward solution to the error rate problem, there is no uniformly optimum way to estimate the monetary error. Three possible methods are proposed, and the results of a series of simulation experiments to compare their performance under a variety of audit conditions is described.
audit, efficiency, error rate, estimation, monetary error, performance measurement, post-stratification, regression, simulation, two-phase sampling
0964-1998
407-422
Barnett, V.
6bdbdcce-fcde-45fa-aba5-fdbbbdcd8eb5
Haworth, J.
4a6ad2a3-3973-4760-82b6-1b3bb6867629
Smith, T.M.F.
61602253-c2d6-43a1-862b-291379e75318
Barnett, V.
6bdbdcce-fcde-45fa-aba5-fdbbbdcd8eb5
Haworth, J.
4a6ad2a3-3973-4760-82b6-1b3bb6867629
Smith, T.M.F.
61602253-c2d6-43a1-862b-291379e75318

Barnett, V., Haworth, J. and Smith, T.M.F. (2001) A two-phase sampling scheme with applications to auditing or sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 164 (2), 407-422. (doi:10.1111/1467-985X.00210).

Record type: Article

Abstract

External auditors such as the National Audit Office (NAO) are the final arbiters on the level of error in accounts presented to them by their clients, and the accuracy or otherwise of individual transactions. In coming to a view on the level of error, they are expected to carry out the audit effectively and efficiently, and therefore need to make the best possible use of all the information at their disposal, even when some of the information may not be totally accurate.
We consider the particular situation where the NAO is given access to the results of tests on a relatively large random sample of transactions, typically conducted by the client's internal auditors. A two-phase sampling scheme arises when the NAO subsequently assesses the quality of the client's data by retesting a subsample of these transactions. The paper discusses methodologies for combining the two sets of data to produce optimum estimates of the proportion of transactions in error (the error rate) and of the level of monetary error in the account. Although a maximum likelihood approach yields a relatively straightforward solution to the error rate problem, there is no uniformly optimum way to estimate the monetary error. Three possible methods are proposed, and the results of a series of simulation experiments to compare their performance under a variety of audit conditions is described.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2001
Keywords: audit, efficiency, error rate, estimation, monetary error, performance measurement, post-stratification, regression, simulation, two-phase sampling
Organisations: Statistics

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 30038
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/30038
ISSN: 0964-1998
PURE UUID: eab70586-6e3c-4a55-a75c-0d5d0ef67b3a

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 May 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 07:36

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: V. Barnett
Author: J. Haworth
Author: T.M.F. Smith

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×