The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Identification of candidate categories of the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF) for a Generic ICF Core Set based on regression modelling

Identification of candidate categories of the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF) for a Generic ICF Core Set based on regression modelling
Identification of candidate categories of the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF) for a Generic ICF Core Set based on regression modelling
Background: The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) is the framework developed by WHO to describe functioning and disability at both the individual and population levels.
While condition-specific ICF Core Sets are useful, a Generic ICF Core Set is needed to describe and compare problems in functioning across health conditions.

Methods: The aims of the multi-centre, cross-sectional study presented here were: a) to propose a method to select ICF categories when a large amount of ICF-based data have to be handled, and b) to identify candidate ICF categories for a Generic ICF Core Set by examining their explanatory power in relation to item one of the SF-36.
The data were collected from 1039 patients using the ICF checklist, the SF-36 and a Comorbidity Questionnaire.
ICF categories to be entered in an initial regression model were selected following systematic steps in accordance with the ICF structure. Based on an initial regression model, additional models were designed by systematically substituting the ICF categories included in it with ICF categories with which they were highly correlated.

Results: Fourteen different regression models were performed. The variance the performed models account for ranged from 22.27% to 24.0%. The ICF category that explained the highest amount of variance in all the models was sensation of pain. In total, thirteen candidate ICF categories for a Generic ICF Core Set were proposed.

Conclusion: The selection strategy based on the ICF structure and the examination of the best possible alternative models does not provide a final answer about which ICF categories must be considered, but leads to a selection of suitable candidates which needs further consideration and comparison with the results of other selection strategies in developing a Generic ICF Core Set.
1471-2288
Cieza, Alarcos
a0df25c5-ee2c-4580-82b3-d0a75591580e
Geyh, Szilvia
277a9f7e-1e41-48ef-ad1a-cb91f559f215
Chatterji, Somnath
a285ff42-8a0c-4136-a89a-3f64f364b6ea
Kostanjsek, Nenad
23ae1206-2272-4cf5-9b2f-ba06f3352dbb
Üstün, Bedirhan T.
9141f75d-ff1d-46d1-a8cd-d1d3c1a5531d
Stucki, Gerold
0534525c-103b-45be-b0a5-061d8867ef0d
Cieza, Alarcos
a0df25c5-ee2c-4580-82b3-d0a75591580e
Geyh, Szilvia
277a9f7e-1e41-48ef-ad1a-cb91f559f215
Chatterji, Somnath
a285ff42-8a0c-4136-a89a-3f64f364b6ea
Kostanjsek, Nenad
23ae1206-2272-4cf5-9b2f-ba06f3352dbb
Üstün, Bedirhan T.
9141f75d-ff1d-46d1-a8cd-d1d3c1a5531d
Stucki, Gerold
0534525c-103b-45be-b0a5-061d8867ef0d

Cieza, Alarcos, Geyh, Szilvia, Chatterji, Somnath, Kostanjsek, Nenad, Üstün, Bedirhan T. and Stucki, Gerold (2006) Identification of candidate categories of the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF) for a Generic ICF Core Set based on regression modelling. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 36 (6). (doi:10.1186/1471-2288-6-36). (PMID:16872536)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) is the framework developed by WHO to describe functioning and disability at both the individual and population levels.
While condition-specific ICF Core Sets are useful, a Generic ICF Core Set is needed to describe and compare problems in functioning across health conditions.

Methods: The aims of the multi-centre, cross-sectional study presented here were: a) to propose a method to select ICF categories when a large amount of ICF-based data have to be handled, and b) to identify candidate ICF categories for a Generic ICF Core Set by examining their explanatory power in relation to item one of the SF-36.
The data were collected from 1039 patients using the ICF checklist, the SF-36 and a Comorbidity Questionnaire.
ICF categories to be entered in an initial regression model were selected following systematic steps in accordance with the ICF structure. Based on an initial regression model, additional models were designed by systematically substituting the ICF categories included in it with ICF categories with which they were highly correlated.

Results: Fourteen different regression models were performed. The variance the performed models account for ranged from 22.27% to 24.0%. The ICF category that explained the highest amount of variance in all the models was sensation of pain. In total, thirteen candidate ICF categories for a Generic ICF Core Set were proposed.

Conclusion: The selection strategy based on the ICF structure and the examination of the best possible alternative models does not provide a final answer about which ICF categories must be considered, but leads to a selection of suitable candidates which needs further consideration and comparison with the results of other selection strategies in developing a Generic ICF Core Set.

Text
1471-2288-6-36.pdf - Version of Record
Available under License Other.
Download (380kB)

More information

Published date: 27 July 2006
Organisations: Psychology

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 341706
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/341706
ISSN: 1471-2288
PURE UUID: 15b52730-4e46-41c0-b6bb-c8b2426e2c4a

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 Aug 2012 13:28
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 11:43

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Alarcos Cieza
Author: Szilvia Geyh
Author: Somnath Chatterji
Author: Nenad Kostanjsek
Author: Bedirhan T. Üstün
Author: Gerold Stucki

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×