The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Critical appraisal guidelines for assessing the quality and impact of user involvement in research

Critical appraisal guidelines for assessing the quality and impact of user involvement in research
Critical appraisal guidelines for assessing the quality and impact of user involvement in research
Background:? The involvement of service users in the design and conduct of health research has developed significantly in the UK in recent years. Involving service users is now seen as a core component of good research practice for all forms of health research. Given the important role that users have in health research, it is necessary to develop guidelines for their effective involvement. Whilst guidelines are currently being formulated, there remain no criteria with which to assess user involvement in published studies and funding applications.

Objective:? This study offers guidelines for appraising the quality and impact of user involvement in published papers and grant applications.

Methods:? Appraisal guidelines for user involvement have been developed on the basis of available literature and experiences from studies involving cancer patients and carers in the design and conduct of research.

Findings:? Nine appraisal criteria have been developed. Criteria include issues such as ‘Is the rationale for involving users clearly demonstrated?’, ‘Is the level of user involvement appropriate?’, ‘Is the recruitment strategy appropriate?’, and ‘Is the nature of training appropriate?’

Conclusion:? Generating and applying guidelines is vital if the impact of user involvement agenda in health research is to be understood.
critical appraisal, guidlines, quality, user involvement
1369-6513
359-368
Wright, David
b82e86cd-3f68-4e1e-a140-4cd9a1ed0d42
Foster, Claire
00786ac1-bd47-4aeb-a0e2-40e058695b73
Amir, Ziv
bf89130a-569e-4457-8f59-4214fe28ec22
Elliott, Jim
c0b62791-fded-40a5-8cbd-577a09ce0b73
Wilson, Roger
b41ee42d-345c-4c56-8707-54269107957e
Wright, David
b82e86cd-3f68-4e1e-a140-4cd9a1ed0d42
Foster, Claire
00786ac1-bd47-4aeb-a0e2-40e058695b73
Amir, Ziv
bf89130a-569e-4457-8f59-4214fe28ec22
Elliott, Jim
c0b62791-fded-40a5-8cbd-577a09ce0b73
Wilson, Roger
b41ee42d-345c-4c56-8707-54269107957e

Wright, David, Foster, Claire, Amir, Ziv, Elliott, Jim and Wilson, Roger (2010) Critical appraisal guidelines for assessing the quality and impact of user involvement in research. Health Expectations, 13 (4), 359-368. (doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00607.x).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background:? The involvement of service users in the design and conduct of health research has developed significantly in the UK in recent years. Involving service users is now seen as a core component of good research practice for all forms of health research. Given the important role that users have in health research, it is necessary to develop guidelines for their effective involvement. Whilst guidelines are currently being formulated, there remain no criteria with which to assess user involvement in published studies and funding applications.

Objective:? This study offers guidelines for appraising the quality and impact of user involvement in published papers and grant applications.

Methods:? Appraisal guidelines for user involvement have been developed on the basis of available literature and experiences from studies involving cancer patients and carers in the design and conduct of research.

Findings:? Nine appraisal criteria have been developed. Criteria include issues such as ‘Is the rationale for involving users clearly demonstrated?’, ‘Is the level of user involvement appropriate?’, ‘Is the recruitment strategy appropriate?’, and ‘Is the nature of training appropriate?’

Conclusion:? Generating and applying guidelines is vital if the impact of user involvement agenda in health research is to be understood.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 4 November 2010
Published date: December 2010
Keywords: critical appraisal, guidlines, quality, user involvement
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 342067
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/342067
ISSN: 1369-6513
PURE UUID: ac0a80e5-36ac-4337-8ba3-d57f7a35bdc2
ORCID for Claire Foster: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4703-8378

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 Aug 2012 16:06
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:21

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: David Wright
Author: Claire Foster ORCID iD
Author: Ziv Amir
Author: Jim Elliott
Author: Roger Wilson

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×