The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The relative value relevance of shareholder versus stakeholder corporate governance disclosure policy reforms in South Africa

The relative value relevance of shareholder versus stakeholder corporate governance disclosure policy reforms in South Africa
The relative value relevance of shareholder versus stakeholder corporate governance disclosure policy reforms in South Africa
Research Question/Issue: South Africa (SA) has pursued distinctive corporate governance (CG) disclosure policy reforms in the form of the King Reports, which require firms to disclose a set of recommended good CG practices on both shareholders and stakeholders. This paper investigates the effect of the new shareholder and stakeholder CG disclosure rules on firm value, as well as the relative value relevance of disclosing good CG practices on shareholders versus stakeholders.

Research Findings/Insights: Using a sample of 169 SA listed firms from 2002 to 2007, we find that disclosing good CG practices on both shareholders and stakeholders impacts positively on firm value, with the latter evidence providing new explicit support for the resource dependence theory. However, we provide additional new evidence, which suggests that disclosing shareholder CG practices contributes significantly more to firm value than stakeholder ones. Our results are robust to controlling for different types of endogeneities.

Theoretical/Academic Implications: The paper generally contributes to the literature on the association between disclosure of CG practices and firm value by specifically modeling the relationship within a unique institutional and CG environment. Specifically, we make two new contributions to the extant literature. First, we show how stakeholder CG disclosure practices impact on firm value. Second, we provide evidence on the relative value relevance of disclosing shareholder and stakeholder CG practices.

Practical/Policy Implications: Our results have important policy and regulatory implications, especially for authorities in other developing countries facing socio-economic problems that are currently contemplating or pursuing CG disclosure policy reforms. Since our evidence indicates that additional value can be created for firms that provide more transparent information on stakeholder CG practices, it provides authorities in other emerging countries currently planning or pursing CG reforms with a strong motivation to formally extend CG disclosure rules to cover both shareholder and stakeholder provisions.
0964-8410
84-105
Ntim, Collins G.
1f344edc-8005-4e96-8972-d56c4dade46b
Opong, Kwaku K.
d0be5207-8d96-417d-9ef4-144d8056e0f3
Danbolt, Jo
2688d46f-2c9d-41c4-a581-1474bb755b21
Ntim, Collins G.
1f344edc-8005-4e96-8972-d56c4dade46b
Opong, Kwaku K.
d0be5207-8d96-417d-9ef4-144d8056e0f3
Danbolt, Jo
2688d46f-2c9d-41c4-a581-1474bb755b21

Ntim, Collins G., Opong, Kwaku K. and Danbolt, Jo (2012) The relative value relevance of shareholder versus stakeholder corporate governance disclosure policy reforms in South Africa. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20 (1), 84-105. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2011.00891.x).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Research Question/Issue: South Africa (SA) has pursued distinctive corporate governance (CG) disclosure policy reforms in the form of the King Reports, which require firms to disclose a set of recommended good CG practices on both shareholders and stakeholders. This paper investigates the effect of the new shareholder and stakeholder CG disclosure rules on firm value, as well as the relative value relevance of disclosing good CG practices on shareholders versus stakeholders.

Research Findings/Insights: Using a sample of 169 SA listed firms from 2002 to 2007, we find that disclosing good CG practices on both shareholders and stakeholders impacts positively on firm value, with the latter evidence providing new explicit support for the resource dependence theory. However, we provide additional new evidence, which suggests that disclosing shareholder CG practices contributes significantly more to firm value than stakeholder ones. Our results are robust to controlling for different types of endogeneities.

Theoretical/Academic Implications: The paper generally contributes to the literature on the association between disclosure of CG practices and firm value by specifically modeling the relationship within a unique institutional and CG environment. Specifically, we make two new contributions to the extant literature. First, we show how stakeholder CG disclosure practices impact on firm value. Second, we provide evidence on the relative value relevance of disclosing shareholder and stakeholder CG practices.

Practical/Policy Implications: Our results have important policy and regulatory implications, especially for authorities in other developing countries facing socio-economic problems that are currently contemplating or pursuing CG disclosure policy reforms. Since our evidence indicates that additional value can be created for firms that provide more transparent information on stakeholder CG practices, it provides authorities in other emerging countries currently planning or pursing CG reforms with a strong motivation to formally extend CG disclosure rules to cover both shareholder and stakeholder provisions.

Text
__filestore.soton.ac.uk_users_cgn1n11_mydesktop_Huddersfield - Laptop_Collins Ntim - Complete_Desktop_All Articles and Papers_CGIR Paper_Corporate Governance An International Review 2012.doc - Accepted Manuscript
Download (486kB)

More information

Published date: 1 January 2012
Organisations: Centre of Excellence for International Banking, Finance & Accounting, Accounting

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 342995
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/342995
ISSN: 0964-8410
PURE UUID: 465f1e3f-820c-4960-b156-1ba719365f1b
ORCID for Collins G. Ntim: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1042-4056

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 20 Sep 2012 09:22
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 02:27

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Collins G. Ntim ORCID iD
Author: Kwaku K. Opong
Author: Jo Danbolt

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×