The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Use of a simple anthropometric measure to predict birth weight

Use of a simple anthropometric measure to predict birth weight
Use of a simple anthropometric measure to predict birth weight
The study was undertaken in 22 centers throughout the world to collect data on a consecutive sample of 400 births. 3 measurements were made for each baby: birth weight, mid-arm circumference, and chest circumference. In addition, the baby's sex and gestational age at birth were recorded. The main problem with data quality was a tendency for weights to be recorded in round hundred grams and circumferences in whole centimeters. The primary objective was to identify cut-off points below which a baby is diagnosed to be at risk for conditions associated with low birth weight. Centers in South Asia, such as Delhi and Chandigarh, had the lowest average birth weight and anthropometric measures, whereas those in Europe, such as St. Petersburg (Russia), Szeged (Hungary), and Yerevan (Armenia) has some of the highest. In 18 of the 22 centers, the correlations between birth weight and chest circumference were greater than those for arm circumference. Regression analyses demonstrated that the best model in each center was birth weight predicted by chest circumference. However, a different regression equation had to be estimated for each center. The estimated regression coefficients varied between the extremes of Islamabad and Chandigarh, where an increase of 1 cm in chest circumference predicted birth weight increases of 260 and 156 gm, respectively. For practical use in developing countries, cut-off points for chest circumference and end-points for birth weight need to be defined for the prediction of low birth weight. Therefore, the standard WHO end-point of 2500 gm was adopted, and babies below this were defined as having low birth weight. Cut-off points of 29 and 30 cm are proposed. Babies with a chest circumference <29 cm would be diagnosed as highly at risk, and they should be referred to a health center immediately. Those with a chest circumference of 29-30 cm would be diagnosed as at risk, and their progress should be monitored carefully.
0042-9686
157-163
Diamond, I.
21cc1457-695f-4063-9503-2e43d6bb8809
McDonald, J.
9adae16e-e1e1-4ddf-bf4c-7231ee8c1c8e
Guidotti, R.
9ba90bee-6703-4421-acf1-5deb4c7a7092
Diamond, I.
21cc1457-695f-4063-9503-2e43d6bb8809
McDonald, J.
9adae16e-e1e1-4ddf-bf4c-7231ee8c1c8e
Guidotti, R.
9ba90bee-6703-4421-acf1-5deb4c7a7092

Diamond, I., McDonald, J. and Guidotti, R. (1993) Use of a simple anthropometric measure to predict birth weight. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 71 (2), 157-163.

Record type: Article

Abstract

The study was undertaken in 22 centers throughout the world to collect data on a consecutive sample of 400 births. 3 measurements were made for each baby: birth weight, mid-arm circumference, and chest circumference. In addition, the baby's sex and gestational age at birth were recorded. The main problem with data quality was a tendency for weights to be recorded in round hundred grams and circumferences in whole centimeters. The primary objective was to identify cut-off points below which a baby is diagnosed to be at risk for conditions associated with low birth weight. Centers in South Asia, such as Delhi and Chandigarh, had the lowest average birth weight and anthropometric measures, whereas those in Europe, such as St. Petersburg (Russia), Szeged (Hungary), and Yerevan (Armenia) has some of the highest. In 18 of the 22 centers, the correlations between birth weight and chest circumference were greater than those for arm circumference. Regression analyses demonstrated that the best model in each center was birth weight predicted by chest circumference. However, a different regression equation had to be estimated for each center. The estimated regression coefficients varied between the extremes of Islamabad and Chandigarh, where an increase of 1 cm in chest circumference predicted birth weight increases of 260 and 156 gm, respectively. For practical use in developing countries, cut-off points for chest circumference and end-points for birth weight need to be defined for the prediction of low birth weight. Therefore, the standard WHO end-point of 2500 gm was adopted, and babies below this were defined as having low birth weight. Cut-off points of 29 and 30 cm are proposed. Babies with a chest circumference <29 cm would be diagnosed as highly at risk, and they should be referred to a health center immediately. Those with a chest circumference of 29-30 cm would be diagnosed as at risk, and their progress should be monitored carefully.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1993

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 34306
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/34306
ISSN: 0042-9686
PURE UUID: 78bd1c92-1d42-457b-8a31-a8d7ed6bbc0d

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 29 May 2008
Last modified: 11 Dec 2021 15:23

Export record

Contributors

Author: I. Diamond
Author: J. McDonald
Author: R. Guidotti

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×