The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Patients’ appraisals of public and private healthcare: a qualitative study of physiotherapy and osteopathy

Patients’ appraisals of public and private healthcare: a qualitative study of physiotherapy and osteopathy
Patients’ appraisals of public and private healthcare: a qualitative study of physiotherapy and osteopathy
Patients have previously reported differences in their experiences of treatments received in the public and private sectors; it remains unclear whether such perceived differences are particular to or shared across different interventions. This study explored whether patients' appraisals of public and private treatments are similar when appraising a complementary therapy (osteopathy) compared to a mainstream therapy (physiotherapy). Thirty-five qualitative interviews were analysed thematically. Patients' appraisals varied by health-care sector and therapy type: physiotherapy was appraised more negatively in the National Health Service than the private sector but osteopathy was appraised similarly within both health-care sectors. Potential reasons for this are discussed.
appraisals/perceptions, complementary and alternative medicine, health-care systems, qualitative methods, treatment
1461-7277
1307-1318
Bradbury, K.J.
87fce0b9-d9c5-42b4-b041-bffeb4430863
Bishop, Felicity L.
1f5429c5-325f-4ac4-aae3-6ba85d079928
Yardley, Lucy
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e
Lewith, George T.
0fc483fa-f17b-47c5-94d9-5c15e65a7625
Bradbury, K.J.
87fce0b9-d9c5-42b4-b041-bffeb4430863
Bishop, Felicity L.
1f5429c5-325f-4ac4-aae3-6ba85d079928
Yardley, Lucy
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e
Lewith, George T.
0fc483fa-f17b-47c5-94d9-5c15e65a7625

Bradbury, K.J., Bishop, Felicity L., Yardley, Lucy and Lewith, George T. (2013) Patients’ appraisals of public and private healthcare: a qualitative study of physiotherapy and osteopathy. Journal of Health Psychology, 18 (10), 1307-1318. (doi:10.1177/1359105312465101). (PMID:23180877)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Patients have previously reported differences in their experiences of treatments received in the public and private sectors; it remains unclear whether such perceived differences are particular to or shared across different interventions. This study explored whether patients' appraisals of public and private treatments are similar when appraising a complementary therapy (osteopathy) compared to a mainstream therapy (physiotherapy). Thirty-five qualitative interviews were analysed thematically. Patients' appraisals varied by health-care sector and therapy type: physiotherapy was appraised more negatively in the National Health Service than the private sector but osteopathy was appraised similarly within both health-care sectors. Potential reasons for this are discussed.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 26 September 2012
Published date: October 2013
Keywords: appraisals/perceptions, complementary and alternative medicine, health-care systems, qualitative methods, treatment
Organisations: Primary Care & Population Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 344343
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/344343
ISSN: 1461-7277
PURE UUID: 3fa19bc5-9dc0-4f6f-a563-f3c7fce7948e
ORCID for K.J. Bradbury: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5513-7571
ORCID for Felicity L. Bishop: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8737-6662
ORCID for Lucy Yardley: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3853-883X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 18 Oct 2012 11:36
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:34

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: K.J. Bradbury ORCID iD
Author: Lucy Yardley ORCID iD
Author: George T. Lewith

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×