When do benevolent employers change their mind? Explaining the retrenchment of defined-benefit pensions in Britain
When do benevolent employers change their mind? Explaining the retrenchment of defined-benefit pensions in Britain
This paper explores the politics of welfare retrenchment, but differs from much of the current literature in this area by focusing not on the decisions of politicians but those of private sector employers. In countries with a large private welfare sector, employers are major social policy players with a significant influence on the generosity of welfare provision, but the rationale behind their actions is not well understood. To explore these issues, a case study is used of the recent fundamental change in UK occupational pension provision, involving a rapid shift from defined-benefit to defined-contribution pensions. The paper shows by means of a micro-simulation of the relative performance of defined-benefit, defined-contribution and state pensions that this shift represents a significant retrenchment. It suggests, using historical material, interview data and insights from behavioural economics, that existing explanations for this change, while valuable, have important gaps because they are based on too narrow a conceptualization of business motives. In this regard, the paper highlights the importance of herd behaviour.
occupational pensions, employers, retrenchment, britain, private social policy-making, herd behaviour
764-785
Bridgen, Paul
6a2060f6-cbab-47d4-a831-ff82350055c9
Meyer, Traute
ee469bf0-ab32-43ac-9f25-1261c24123fe
December 2005
Bridgen, Paul
6a2060f6-cbab-47d4-a831-ff82350055c9
Meyer, Traute
ee469bf0-ab32-43ac-9f25-1261c24123fe
Bridgen, Paul and Meyer, Traute
(2005)
When do benevolent employers change their mind? Explaining the retrenchment of defined-benefit pensions in Britain.
Social Policy and Administration, 39 (7), .
(doi:10.1111/j.1467-9515.2005.00468.x).
Abstract
This paper explores the politics of welfare retrenchment, but differs from much of the current literature in this area by focusing not on the decisions of politicians but those of private sector employers. In countries with a large private welfare sector, employers are major social policy players with a significant influence on the generosity of welfare provision, but the rationale behind their actions is not well understood. To explore these issues, a case study is used of the recent fundamental change in UK occupational pension provision, involving a rapid shift from defined-benefit to defined-contribution pensions. The paper shows by means of a micro-simulation of the relative performance of defined-benefit, defined-contribution and state pensions that this shift represents a significant retrenchment. It suggests, using historical material, interview data and insights from behavioural economics, that existing explanations for this change, while valuable, have important gaps because they are based on too narrow a conceptualization of business motives. In this regard, the paper highlights the importance of herd behaviour.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: December 2005
Keywords:
occupational pensions, employers, retrenchment, britain, private social policy-making, herd behaviour
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 34908
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/34908
ISSN: 0144-5596
PURE UUID: bb0d3064-6dbc-4942-943d-f24401438388
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 16 May 2006
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:16
Export record
Altmetrics
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics
