The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A randomised controlled trial of management strategies for acute infective conjunctivitis in general practice

A randomised controlled trial of management strategies for acute infective conjunctivitis in general practice
A randomised controlled trial of management strategies for acute infective conjunctivitis in general practice
Objective: to assess different management strategies for acute infective conjunctivitis.

Design: open, factorial, randomised controlled trial.

Setting: 30 general practices in southern England.

Participants: 307 adults and children with acute infective conjunctivitis.

Intervention: one of three antibiotic prescribing strategies--immediate antibiotics (chloramphenicol eye drops; n=104), no antibiotics (controls; n=94), or delayed antibiotics (n=109); a patient information leaflet or not; and an eye swab or not.

Main outcome measures: severity of symptoms on days 1-3 after consultation, duration of symptoms, and belief in the effectiveness of antibiotics for eye infections.

Results: prescribing strategies did not affect the severity of symptoms but duration of moderate symptoms was less with antibiotics: no antibiotics (controls) 4.8 days, immediate antibiotics 3.3 days (risk ratio 0.7, 95% confidence interval 0.6 to 0.8), delayed antibiotics 3.9 days (0.8, 0.7 to 0.9). Compared with no initial offer of antibiotics, antibiotic use was higher in the immediate antibiotic group: controls 30%, immediate antibiotics 99% (odds ratio 185.4, 23.9 to 1439.2), delayed antibiotics 53% (2.9, 1.4 to 5.7), as was belief in the effectiveness of antibiotics: controls 47%, immediate antibiotics 67% (odds ratio 2.4, 1.1 to 5.0), delayed antibiotics 55% (1.4, 0.7 to 3.0), and intention to reattend for eye infections: controls 40%, immediate antibiotics 68% (3.2, 1.6 to 6.4), delayed antibiotics 41% (1.0, 0.5 to 2.0). A patient information leaflet or eye swab had no effect on the main outcomes. Reattendance within two weeks was less in the delayed compared with immediate antibiotic group: 0.3 (0.1 to 1.0) v 0.7 (0.3 to 1.6).

Conclusions: delayed prescribing of antibiotics is probably the most appropriate strategy for managing acute conjunctivitis in primary care. It reduces antibiotic use, shows no evidence of medicalisation, provides similar duration and severity of symptoms to immediate prescribing, and reduces reattendance for eye infections.

Trial registration: current controlled trials ISRCTN32956955.
0959-8138
Everitt, Hazel A.
80b9452f-9632-45a8-b017-ceeeee6971ef
Little, Paul S.
1bf2d1f7-200c-47a5-ab16-fe5a8756a777
Smith, Peter W.F.
961a01a3-bf4c-43ca-9599-5be4fd5d3940
Everitt, Hazel A.
80b9452f-9632-45a8-b017-ceeeee6971ef
Little, Paul S.
1bf2d1f7-200c-47a5-ab16-fe5a8756a777
Smith, Peter W.F.
961a01a3-bf4c-43ca-9599-5be4fd5d3940

Everitt, Hazel A., Little, Paul S. and Smith, Peter W.F. (2006) A randomised controlled trial of management strategies for acute infective conjunctivitis in general practice. BMJ, 333 (7563). (doi:10.1136/bmj.38891.551088.7C). (PMID:16847013)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective: to assess different management strategies for acute infective conjunctivitis.

Design: open, factorial, randomised controlled trial.

Setting: 30 general practices in southern England.

Participants: 307 adults and children with acute infective conjunctivitis.

Intervention: one of three antibiotic prescribing strategies--immediate antibiotics (chloramphenicol eye drops; n=104), no antibiotics (controls; n=94), or delayed antibiotics (n=109); a patient information leaflet or not; and an eye swab or not.

Main outcome measures: severity of symptoms on days 1-3 after consultation, duration of symptoms, and belief in the effectiveness of antibiotics for eye infections.

Results: prescribing strategies did not affect the severity of symptoms but duration of moderate symptoms was less with antibiotics: no antibiotics (controls) 4.8 days, immediate antibiotics 3.3 days (risk ratio 0.7, 95% confidence interval 0.6 to 0.8), delayed antibiotics 3.9 days (0.8, 0.7 to 0.9). Compared with no initial offer of antibiotics, antibiotic use was higher in the immediate antibiotic group: controls 30%, immediate antibiotics 99% (odds ratio 185.4, 23.9 to 1439.2), delayed antibiotics 53% (2.9, 1.4 to 5.7), as was belief in the effectiveness of antibiotics: controls 47%, immediate antibiotics 67% (odds ratio 2.4, 1.1 to 5.0), delayed antibiotics 55% (1.4, 0.7 to 3.0), and intention to reattend for eye infections: controls 40%, immediate antibiotics 68% (3.2, 1.6 to 6.4), delayed antibiotics 41% (1.0, 0.5 to 2.0). A patient information leaflet or eye swab had no effect on the main outcomes. Reattendance within two weeks was less in the delayed compared with immediate antibiotic group: 0.3 (0.1 to 1.0) v 0.7 (0.3 to 1.6).

Conclusions: delayed prescribing of antibiotics is probably the most appropriate strategy for managing acute conjunctivitis in primary care. It reduces antibiotic use, shows no evidence of medicalisation, provides similar duration and severity of symptoms to immediate prescribing, and reduces reattendance for eye infections.

Trial registration: current controlled trials ISRCTN32956955.

Text
bmj.38891.551088.7Cv1.pdf - Version of Record
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (106kB)
Request a copy

More information

Published date: 17 July 2006

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 40660
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/40660
ISSN: 0959-8138
PURE UUID: 24345d5a-1e3b-4b61-86af-82fb12578433
ORCID for Hazel A. Everitt: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7362-8403
ORCID for Peter W.F. Smith: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4423-5410

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Jul 2006
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:11

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×