The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A straitjacket with wriggle room: the Beveridge report, the Treasury and the Exchequer's pension liability, 1942–59

A straitjacket with wriggle room: the Beveridge report, the Treasury and the Exchequer's pension liability, 1942–59
A straitjacket with wriggle room: the Beveridge report, the Treasury and the Exchequer's pension liability, 1942–59
The last two decades have seen the establishment of a new orthodoxy about William Beveridge's 1942 pensions plan which questions both the radical credentials of his proposals and their practical influence and coherence. However, as this article shows, while this new orthodoxy has usefully demolished some myths about Beveridge's legacy, it has also exaggerated the plan's conservatism and inflexibility. Certainly, Beveridge did not propose that the state should trespass far on to the territory he believed should be covered by voluntarism. However, his scheme was more redistributive and financially flexible than has often been suggested. As the article further shows, it was the actions of postwar politicians, prompted by a vigorous campaign emanating in the Treasury, that reined in the more radical features of Beveridge's plan, and reduced the pension system's ability to respond flexibly to the demands of the 1950s. The significance of the findings of this study for our understanding of the postwar welfare consensus will be highlighted throughout its course.
0955-2359
1-25
Bridgen, Paul
6a2060f6-cbab-47d4-a831-ff82350055c9
Bridgen, Paul
6a2060f6-cbab-47d4-a831-ff82350055c9

Bridgen, Paul (2006) A straitjacket with wriggle room: the Beveridge report, the Treasury and the Exchequer's pension liability, 1942–59. Twentieth Century British History, 17 (1), 1-25. (doi:10.1093/tcbh/hwi062).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The last two decades have seen the establishment of a new orthodoxy about William Beveridge's 1942 pensions plan which questions both the radical credentials of his proposals and their practical influence and coherence. However, as this article shows, while this new orthodoxy has usefully demolished some myths about Beveridge's legacy, it has also exaggerated the plan's conservatism and inflexibility. Certainly, Beveridge did not propose that the state should trespass far on to the territory he believed should be covered by voluntarism. However, his scheme was more redistributive and financially flexible than has often been suggested. As the article further shows, it was the actions of postwar politicians, prompted by a vigorous campaign emanating in the Treasury, that reined in the more radical features of Beveridge's plan, and reduced the pension system's ability to respond flexibly to the demands of the 1950s. The significance of the findings of this study for our understanding of the postwar welfare consensus will be highlighted throughout its course.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2006

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 40702
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/40702
ISSN: 0955-2359
PURE UUID: 8cddfee0-e542-4db1-936a-538e26ad1b24
ORCID for Paul Bridgen: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6039-3254

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Jul 2006
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:03

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×