The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Bioethics and rural health: theorizing place, space, and subjects

Bioethics and rural health: theorizing place, space, and subjects
Bioethics and rural health: theorizing place, space, and subjects
The field of bioethics has been criticized for its universalizing tendencies, attributed in a large part to its foundations in moral philosophy and the level of abstraction of much bioethical discourse. Efforts to particularize bioethics have included the ''turn toward casuistry'', the emergence of feminist and disability rights critiques of mainstream bioethics, and ethnographic contributions that examine the situatedness of ethical acts, practices, and meanings in local contexts. Such work introduces into bioethics dimensions of space, place, and time; nonetheless, these remain relatively unexplored as constitutive elements and/or influences of the phenomena of ethics discourse and ethics-related practices. Drawing from an ethnographic study of genetics in rural health, this paper presents a sociological discussion of space/time and bioethics through examination of rural health settings. Issues raised include intersections of spatial and power relations, socio-spatial gradients of expertise, and socio-spatial dimensions of ethics knowledge and practices within medical settings.
bioethics, rural health, genetic services, place
0277-9536
2277-2288
Kelly, Susan E.
90e3be8e-0e1e-4278-ad82-83b76d79df1d
Kelly, Susan E.
90e3be8e-0e1e-4278-ad82-83b76d79df1d

Kelly, Susan E. (2003) Bioethics and rural health: theorizing place, space, and subjects. Social Science & Medicine, 56 (11), 2277-2288. (doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00227-7).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The field of bioethics has been criticized for its universalizing tendencies, attributed in a large part to its foundations in moral philosophy and the level of abstraction of much bioethical discourse. Efforts to particularize bioethics have included the ''turn toward casuistry'', the emergence of feminist and disability rights critiques of mainstream bioethics, and ethnographic contributions that examine the situatedness of ethical acts, practices, and meanings in local contexts. Such work introduces into bioethics dimensions of space, place, and time; nonetheless, these remain relatively unexplored as constitutive elements and/or influences of the phenomena of ethics discourse and ethics-related practices. Drawing from an ethnographic study of genetics in rural health, this paper presents a sociological discussion of space/time and bioethics through examination of rural health settings. Issues raised include intersections of spatial and power relations, socio-spatial gradients of expertise, and socio-spatial dimensions of ethics knowledge and practices within medical settings.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: June 2003
Keywords: bioethics, rural health, genetic services, place

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 42773
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/42773
ISSN: 0277-9536
PURE UUID: ab2964dd-424b-4db0-9197-11ebd454f477

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Jan 2007
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 08:50

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Susan E. Kelly

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×