The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

All changes great and small: exploring approaches to change and its leadership

All changes great and small: exploring approaches to change and its leadership
All changes great and small: exploring approaches to change and its leadership
Although the growing need for change in organizations it is widely acknowledged it is asserted that up to 70% of change initiatives fail. While there have been attempts to understand the reasons for failure these have been seen as inconclusive, and a need for further empirical work has been identified. Within the growing literature on change leadership there are assertions that the root cause of many change problems is leadership behaviour.
This article begins by exploring the change literature and, in particular the broadening of this literature with the inclusion of complexity and evolutionary theories. From the literature the authors propose a typology of change approach is proposed. In examining change the authors also examine emerging thoughts from the change leadership literature. Combining these different streams of literature leads to three core research questions, which are:
(1)What approach to change management is likely to be most effective in today's business environment?
(2)What leadership behaviours tend to be associated with effective change management? And
(3)Are leadership behaviours related to the underlying assumptions within different approaches to change? These questions are explored using a case study methodology. The study involved seven organizations and 40 informants who provided 70 change stories. The data was initially analysed as qualitative data and subsequently (following participant lines of inquiry) quantitatively.
Both qualitative and quantitative data indicated that change approaches that were based on assumptions of linearity, were unsuccessful, whereas those built on assumptions of complexity were more successful. Approaches classified as emergent change were found to be the most successful. In examining leadership behaviours three broad categories emerged: (1) shaping behaviour; (2) framing change; and (3) creating capacity. Analyses of the data indicated that leader-centric behaviours (shaping behaviour) impaired change implementation.
change, change approaches, leadership, leader behaviours, complexity, collaborative research
1469-7017
121-151
Higgs, Malcolm
bd61667f-4b7c-4caf-9d79-aee907c03ae3
Rowland, Deborah
b0a90189-ac22-4fff-9695-f850b04e679a
Higgs, Malcolm
bd61667f-4b7c-4caf-9d79-aee907c03ae3
Rowland, Deborah
b0a90189-ac22-4fff-9695-f850b04e679a

Higgs, Malcolm and Rowland, Deborah (2005) All changes great and small: exploring approaches to change and its leadership. Change Management Journal, 5 (2), 121-151. (doi:10.1080/14697010500082902).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Although the growing need for change in organizations it is widely acknowledged it is asserted that up to 70% of change initiatives fail. While there have been attempts to understand the reasons for failure these have been seen as inconclusive, and a need for further empirical work has been identified. Within the growing literature on change leadership there are assertions that the root cause of many change problems is leadership behaviour.
This article begins by exploring the change literature and, in particular the broadening of this literature with the inclusion of complexity and evolutionary theories. From the literature the authors propose a typology of change approach is proposed. In examining change the authors also examine emerging thoughts from the change leadership literature. Combining these different streams of literature leads to three core research questions, which are:
(1)What approach to change management is likely to be most effective in today's business environment?
(2)What leadership behaviours tend to be associated with effective change management? And
(3)Are leadership behaviours related to the underlying assumptions within different approaches to change? These questions are explored using a case study methodology. The study involved seven organizations and 40 informants who provided 70 change stories. The data was initially analysed as qualitative data and subsequently (following participant lines of inquiry) quantitatively.
Both qualitative and quantitative data indicated that change approaches that were based on assumptions of linearity, were unsuccessful, whereas those built on assumptions of complexity were more successful. Approaches classified as emergent change were found to be the most successful. In examining leadership behaviours three broad categories emerged: (1) shaping behaviour; (2) framing change; and (3) creating capacity. Analyses of the data indicated that leader-centric behaviours (shaping behaviour) impaired change implementation.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: June 2005
Keywords: change, change approaches, leadership, leader behaviours, complexity, collaborative research

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 51416
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/51416
ISSN: 1469-7017
PURE UUID: 1b8ec8f9-23ef-4502-b27a-7fd15ece1846
ORCID for Malcolm Higgs: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9032-0416

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 Jun 2008
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:57

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Malcolm Higgs ORCID iD
Author: Deborah Rowland

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×