The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Comparing environmental movements in periods of latency and visibility

Comparing environmental movements in periods of latency and visibility
Comparing environmental movements in periods of latency and visibility
The environmental movement is a network of organisations and individuals working for environmental improvement or the prevention of environmental degradation using institutional, semi- and non-institutional channels. This network consists of a variety of types of organisations that have a range of conservationist to radical strategies and beliefs, and are active from the very local level right up to the transnational level. The shape and form of this network, however, varies considerably from time to time. During ‘latent’ periods – temporary phases during which movement activity is invisible to the general public – movement organisations tend to become more isolated and local groups will be moribund or inclined to infighting, as ideological differences and differing fields of action prevent interaction. During ‘visible’ phases, during which movement activity is highly noticeable as a result of engagement in protest, the need to win a campaign may reduce ideological chasms and create denser networks of interaction. This paper demonstrates the stark differences between environmental movement networks at visible and latent times using data from surveys at two different points in time of the networks of environmental organisations in southeast London. During 2001, when the local community was fighting a proposal for a multiplex cinema to be built at Crystal Palace, the movement was relatively dense, and there was even evidence of networking between the most unlikely bedfellows of middle class residents’ associations and dreadlocked tree-dwellers. Two years later, when this campaign had been won, the movement had become much more fractured, and radical groups and residents’ associations had virtually disappeared from the network, burning the bridges they had created in the network as they evaporated. These differences are demonstrated using some basic social network analysis measures including network mapping.
1572-3763
109-139
Saunders, Clare
c1478ea2-16d7-4fac-856d-516c97e4d5eb
Saunders, Clare
c1478ea2-16d7-4fac-856d-516c97e4d5eb

Saunders, Clare (2007) Comparing environmental movements in periods of latency and visibility. Graduate Journal of Social Science, 4 (1), 109-139.

Record type: Article

Abstract

The environmental movement is a network of organisations and individuals working for environmental improvement or the prevention of environmental degradation using institutional, semi- and non-institutional channels. This network consists of a variety of types of organisations that have a range of conservationist to radical strategies and beliefs, and are active from the very local level right up to the transnational level. The shape and form of this network, however, varies considerably from time to time. During ‘latent’ periods – temporary phases during which movement activity is invisible to the general public – movement organisations tend to become more isolated and local groups will be moribund or inclined to infighting, as ideological differences and differing fields of action prevent interaction. During ‘visible’ phases, during which movement activity is highly noticeable as a result of engagement in protest, the need to win a campaign may reduce ideological chasms and create denser networks of interaction. This paper demonstrates the stark differences between environmental movement networks at visible and latent times using data from surveys at two different points in time of the networks of environmental organisations in southeast London. During 2001, when the local community was fighting a proposal for a multiplex cinema to be built at Crystal Palace, the movement was relatively dense, and there was even evidence of networking between the most unlikely bedfellows of middle class residents’ associations and dreadlocked tree-dwellers. Two years later, when this campaign had been won, the movement had become much more fractured, and radical groups and residents’ associations had virtually disappeared from the network, burning the bridges they had created in the network as they evaporated. These differences are demonstrated using some basic social network analysis measures including network mapping.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2007

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 55048
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/55048
ISSN: 1572-3763
PURE UUID: 54f2e4c6-fda4-4578-b0e9-15f0d593cc67

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 Aug 2008
Last modified: 11 Dec 2021 17:42

Export record

Contributors

Author: Clare Saunders

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×