The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Challenges to inter-spike interval models of pitch: the responses of cochlear nucleus neurons to band-pass filtered pulse trains

Challenges to inter-spike interval models of pitch: the responses of cochlear nucleus neurons to band-pass filtered pulse trains
Challenges to inter-spike interval models of pitch: the responses of cochlear nucleus neurons to band-pass filtered pulse trains
Carlyon et al. (J Acoust Soc Am 112: 621-33, 2002) found that a pulse train with alternating inter-pulse intervals between 4 and 6 ms (“4-6 stimulus”) is perceived as having a periodicity of 5.7ms. Using a model that relies on neuronal first order intervals (FOIs) for pitch perception, they showed that the recovery of the auditory nerve from adaptation is not sufficient to explain this effect and suggested that a weighting function that favours longer FOI intervals was needed to account for the perceived pitch. Here we investigate whether there are neurons, or populations of neurons, at the next stage of processing, the cochlear nucleus (CN), that give greater representation to longer intervals. We measured the responses of single neurons in the ventral CN of anesthetised guinea pigs to isochronous and anisochronous pulse trains. Pulse trains were band-pass filtered between 3900 Hz and 5300 Hz. Isochronous pulse trains had interpulse intervals of 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 ms. Anisochronous pulse trains had alternating interpulse intervals between 4 and 6 ms. The results are based on the responses of 58 units, classified by the shape of their post stimulus time histograms as Primary with notch (PN, 9), transient chopper (CT, 22), sustained chopper (CS, 10) and onsets (ON, 17). PN and CT units showed a recovery behaviour that is quantitatively similar to the auditory nerve. ON and CS units showed a faster recovery between 4 and 6 ms, but not enough to account for the size of the psychophysical effect. The average of FOI distributions for single units generally has too many long intervals to account for the observed pitch of the 4-6 stimulus. When sequentially interleaving the spikes from all units the average FOI distribution contains more shorter intervals, but, by interleaving spikes from just 2 to 4 units the average FOI becomes small enough to explain the observed pitch of the 4-6 stimulus. The location of units that may participate in such an analysis remains obscure.
pp.36
Bleeck, S.
c888ccba-e64c-47bf-b8fa-a687e87ec16c
Ingham, N.
75a168bc-5573-49b2-ae48-e2d76250c82a
Carlyon, R.P.
aee00939-d7df-449a-8a31-8620e0713a07
Winter, I.M.
c816c472-68e4-47fb-833d-db8b8d7fde27
Bleeck, S.
c888ccba-e64c-47bf-b8fa-a687e87ec16c
Ingham, N.
75a168bc-5573-49b2-ae48-e2d76250c82a
Carlyon, R.P.
aee00939-d7df-449a-8a31-8620e0713a07
Winter, I.M.
c816c472-68e4-47fb-833d-db8b8d7fde27

Bleeck, S., Ingham, N., Carlyon, R.P. and Winter, I.M. (2006) Challenges to inter-spike interval models of pitch: the responses of cochlear nucleus neurons to band-pass filtered pulse trains. 29th Annual MidWinter Research Meeting: Association for Research in Otolaryngology, Baltimore, USA. 05 - 09 Feb 2006. pp.36 .

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

Carlyon et al. (J Acoust Soc Am 112: 621-33, 2002) found that a pulse train with alternating inter-pulse intervals between 4 and 6 ms (“4-6 stimulus”) is perceived as having a periodicity of 5.7ms. Using a model that relies on neuronal first order intervals (FOIs) for pitch perception, they showed that the recovery of the auditory nerve from adaptation is not sufficient to explain this effect and suggested that a weighting function that favours longer FOI intervals was needed to account for the perceived pitch. Here we investigate whether there are neurons, or populations of neurons, at the next stage of processing, the cochlear nucleus (CN), that give greater representation to longer intervals. We measured the responses of single neurons in the ventral CN of anesthetised guinea pigs to isochronous and anisochronous pulse trains. Pulse trains were band-pass filtered between 3900 Hz and 5300 Hz. Isochronous pulse trains had interpulse intervals of 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 ms. Anisochronous pulse trains had alternating interpulse intervals between 4 and 6 ms. The results are based on the responses of 58 units, classified by the shape of their post stimulus time histograms as Primary with notch (PN, 9), transient chopper (CT, 22), sustained chopper (CS, 10) and onsets (ON, 17). PN and CT units showed a recovery behaviour that is quantitatively similar to the auditory nerve. ON and CS units showed a faster recovery between 4 and 6 ms, but not enough to account for the size of the psychophysical effect. The average of FOI distributions for single units generally has too many long intervals to account for the observed pitch of the 4-6 stimulus. When sequentially interleaving the spikes from all units the average FOI distribution contains more shorter intervals, but, by interleaving spikes from just 2 to 4 units the average FOI becomes small enough to explain the observed pitch of the 4-6 stimulus. The location of units that may participate in such an analysis remains obscure.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: February 2006
Venue - Dates: 29th Annual MidWinter Research Meeting: Association for Research in Otolaryngology, Baltimore, USA, 2006-02-05 - 2006-02-09
Organisations: Human Sciences Group

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 57837
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/57837
PURE UUID: fba7dc41-e727-4af2-8bfb-e7a0d3180b1d
ORCID for S. Bleeck: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4378-3394

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 13 Aug 2008
Last modified: 12 Dec 2021 03:33

Export record

Contributors

Author: S. Bleeck ORCID iD
Author: N. Ingham
Author: R.P. Carlyon
Author: I.M. Winter

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×