The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Supply chain management: a comparison of Scandinavian and American perspectives

Supply chain management: a comparison of Scandinavian and American perspectives
Supply chain management: a comparison of Scandinavian and American perspectives
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to advance understanding of international differences in supply chain management (SCM) perspectives and practices, by comparing perceptions of Scandinavian and American supply chain managers.
Design/methodology/approach – The survey focused on the definition of SCM, along with facilitators of and barriers to SCM implementation. A four-page questionnaire was designed and sent by mail. After follow-ups, 23 Scandinavians and 104 Americans returned completed questionnaires.
Findings – While many similarities were found between Scandinavians and Americans, several differences were also identified. Both groups have adopted broad, multiple function perspectives on SCM; and both groups perceive SCM implementation to be slower and more difficult than expected. Two differences are the Americans' greater concern about incompatible systems and implementation costs as barriers to SCM, compared to the Scandinavians.
Research limitations/implications – The study is based on relatively small samples, of limited functional (logistics) and geographic (Scandinavia and America) scope. Future research should expand the functional focus into purchasing, operations, and marketing; and the geographic coverage to other parts of the world.
Practical implications – Internal resistance is more of a barrier than external (customer or supplier) resistance to SCM. Thus, organizations should focus first on internal (functional) integration, and then move onto inter-organizational integration. However, employees working with customers and suppliers should use these external relationships to inspire closer internal relationships. Further, people are more critical than technology in implementing SCM. Organizations should get the right people in place first, and then think about technology.
Originality/value – There is little empirical research on SCM implementation. Practitioners and researchers should find value in this unique comparative study.
cross-cultural studies, scandinavia, supply chain management, united states of america
0960-0035
126-142
Halldorsson, A.
7397eb8b-6866-4e6f-859a-5d4042550417
Larson, P.D.
b34ed066-fa0a-4ea7-b7f4-733fa952f9ff
Poist, R.F.
375510ef-0641-48fd-a64a-897a2cfd84d3
Halldorsson, A.
7397eb8b-6866-4e6f-859a-5d4042550417
Larson, P.D.
b34ed066-fa0a-4ea7-b7f4-733fa952f9ff
Poist, R.F.
375510ef-0641-48fd-a64a-897a2cfd84d3

Halldorsson, A., Larson, P.D. and Poist, R.F. (2008) Supply chain management: a comparison of Scandinavian and American perspectives. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38 (2), 126-142. (doi:10.1108/09600030810861206).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to advance understanding of international differences in supply chain management (SCM) perspectives and practices, by comparing perceptions of Scandinavian and American supply chain managers.
Design/methodology/approach – The survey focused on the definition of SCM, along with facilitators of and barriers to SCM implementation. A four-page questionnaire was designed and sent by mail. After follow-ups, 23 Scandinavians and 104 Americans returned completed questionnaires.
Findings – While many similarities were found between Scandinavians and Americans, several differences were also identified. Both groups have adopted broad, multiple function perspectives on SCM; and both groups perceive SCM implementation to be slower and more difficult than expected. Two differences are the Americans' greater concern about incompatible systems and implementation costs as barriers to SCM, compared to the Scandinavians.
Research limitations/implications – The study is based on relatively small samples, of limited functional (logistics) and geographic (Scandinavia and America) scope. Future research should expand the functional focus into purchasing, operations, and marketing; and the geographic coverage to other parts of the world.
Practical implications – Internal resistance is more of a barrier than external (customer or supplier) resistance to SCM. Thus, organizations should focus first on internal (functional) integration, and then move onto inter-organizational integration. However, employees working with customers and suppliers should use these external relationships to inspire closer internal relationships. Further, people are more critical than technology in implementing SCM. Organizations should get the right people in place first, and then think about technology.
Originality/value – There is little empirical research on SCM implementation. Practitioners and researchers should find value in this unique comparative study.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2008
Keywords: cross-cultural studies, scandinavia, supply chain management, united states of america

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 57925
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/57925
ISSN: 0960-0035
PURE UUID: 1a6ae5f8-9387-4f52-ad75-7f7fb4899086

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 18 Aug 2008
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 11:09

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: A. Halldorsson
Author: P.D. Larson
Author: R.F. Poist

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×