The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Detection of insincere grips: multivariate analysis approach

Detection of insincere grips: multivariate analysis approach
Detection of insincere grips: multivariate analysis approach
BACKGROUND Smith and Chengalur were successful in using grip test and the cut-off criterion method to detect fake grips in healthy subjects and subjects with hand injuries. The purpose of this study is to test if methods other than the cut-off method, i.e. discriminate analysis and logistic analysis methods, cn be used to provide a more accurate detection of fake grips, with the use of sustain grip test. METHOD Two groups of subjects were recruited. Group one consisted of 40 healthy subjects and group two consisted of 80 subjects with history of various types of hand injuries. For each subjects they were randomly assigned a hand to perform fake grips. ANALYSIS Analyses were performed separately in Group 1 and Group 2, and then combining group 1 and 2. For each group, we tried to estimate the percentage of accuracy of detection of fake grip by the discriminate analyses method and the logistic analysis method. RESULTS For group 1, the percentage of accuracy in detecting fake grips were 66.7% in male and 39.5% in female by discriminate analysis, and 77.8% in male and 84.2% in female by logistic regression. Both methods can detect 90%-100% sincere grips. For group 2, the percentage of accuracy in detecting fake grips were 58.3% in male and 58.0% in female by discriminate analysis, and 88.3% in male and 77.0% in female by logistic regression. Both methods can detect 90%-100% sincere grips. Further analysis by testing the relationship between degree of faking and accuracy of fake detection, it was found that the higher degree o faking, the more accurate in the detection. For subjects who performed 20% or 50% of their maximum grips, we can detect 92% faking in male and 86.5% in female by using logistic regression method.
fake grip, sincere grip, discriminate analysis method, logistic analysis method, cut-off criterion method
Dasari, B.D.
f5147fce-005a-44ca-a150-00c1618db92e
Leung, K.F.
e76437b5-2815-4cd5-838f-9e693edb481c
Dasari, B.D.
f5147fce-005a-44ca-a150-00c1618db92e
Leung, K.F.
e76437b5-2815-4cd5-838f-9e693edb481c

Dasari, B.D. and Leung, K.F. (2004) Detection of insincere grips: multivariate analysis approach. 5th Congress of the Asian Pacific Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand, Osaka, Japan. 12 - 15 Nov 2004.

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

BACKGROUND Smith and Chengalur were successful in using grip test and the cut-off criterion method to detect fake grips in healthy subjects and subjects with hand injuries. The purpose of this study is to test if methods other than the cut-off method, i.e. discriminate analysis and logistic analysis methods, cn be used to provide a more accurate detection of fake grips, with the use of sustain grip test. METHOD Two groups of subjects were recruited. Group one consisted of 40 healthy subjects and group two consisted of 80 subjects with history of various types of hand injuries. For each subjects they were randomly assigned a hand to perform fake grips. ANALYSIS Analyses were performed separately in Group 1 and Group 2, and then combining group 1 and 2. For each group, we tried to estimate the percentage of accuracy of detection of fake grip by the discriminate analyses method and the logistic analysis method. RESULTS For group 1, the percentage of accuracy in detecting fake grips were 66.7% in male and 39.5% in female by discriminate analysis, and 77.8% in male and 84.2% in female by logistic regression. Both methods can detect 90%-100% sincere grips. For group 2, the percentage of accuracy in detecting fake grips were 58.3% in male and 58.0% in female by discriminate analysis, and 88.3% in male and 77.0% in female by logistic regression. Both methods can detect 90%-100% sincere grips. Further analysis by testing the relationship between degree of faking and accuracy of fake detection, it was found that the higher degree o faking, the more accurate in the detection. For subjects who performed 20% or 50% of their maximum grips, we can detect 92% faking in male and 86.5% in female by using logistic regression method.

Slideshow
5APFSSH_Osaka_JapanNovember08.ppt - Other
Download (421kB)

More information

Published date: 2004
Venue - Dates: 5th Congress of the Asian Pacific Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand, Osaka, Japan, 2004-11-12 - 2004-11-15
Keywords: fake grip, sincere grip, discriminate analysis method, logistic analysis method, cut-off criterion method

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 58407
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/58407
PURE UUID: f4bf7645-7ecb-4486-a390-a73d5997d71b

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 14 Aug 2008
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 11:11

Export record

Contributors

Author: B.D. Dasari
Author: K.F. Leung

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×