The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Evaluating the construct validity of the Trunk Impairment Scale: a Rasch analysis of its subscales

Evaluating the construct validity of the Trunk Impairment Scale: a Rasch analysis of its subscales
Evaluating the construct validity of the Trunk Impairment Scale: a Rasch analysis of its subscales
Background:
The Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) evaluates static, dynamic sitting balance and trunk coordination in people after stroke. This study aimed to evaluate the construct validity of the subscales of the TIS.
Method
A total of 162 participants (mean age 67, SD=11), in all stages after stroke, were included in the study. Rasch analysis (Partial Credit Model) was used (RUMM2020 software).
Results
There were no disordered thresholds on any of the polytomous items. The static sitting balance subscale (SSB) did not fit the Rasch model (Chi-square=15.68; p=0.0004). Wewere unable to examine DIF due to a large number of extreme cases in the dataset. The dynamic sitting balance subscale (DSB) fitted the Rasch model (Bonferroni adjusted p value=0.005) after splitting item 2 by Barthel categories to adjust for uniform DIF (Chi-square=42.65; p=0.0052). The coordination subscale (COO) fitted the Rasch model and did not display uniform or non-uniform DIF (Chi-square=7.87; p=0.446). In DSB and COO fewer than 5% of the independent t-tests performed on person estimated locations were significant, further supporting unidimensionality of these subscales. Graphical explorationof thresholds for DSB and COO confirmed a hierarchy of dependent items. Person and items were well distributed across the continuum of balance impairment.
Discussion
We were unable to examine SSB in full and further work with patients with very severe static sitting balance impairments is needed. Item 2 of DSB needs to be given detailed attention before assessing people after stroke.
Conclusion
Construct validity of two subscales was confirmed using Rasch analysis. Further work is needed to examine SSB.
Verheyden, G.
dd0095fa-83d8-4ffd-af2f-fcef6f8a3997
Kersten, P.
b5c4e49b-d73b-46f1-bdc4-266170562b67
Verheyden, G.
dd0095fa-83d8-4ffd-af2f-fcef6f8a3997
Kersten, P.
b5c4e49b-d73b-46f1-bdc4-266170562b67

Verheyden, G. and Kersten, P. (2007) Evaluating the construct validity of the Trunk Impairment Scale: a Rasch analysis of its subscales. Society for Research in Rehabilitation, Leeds, UK. 03 - 04 Jul 2007.

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

Background:
The Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) evaluates static, dynamic sitting balance and trunk coordination in people after stroke. This study aimed to evaluate the construct validity of the subscales of the TIS.
Method
A total of 162 participants (mean age 67, SD=11), in all stages after stroke, were included in the study. Rasch analysis (Partial Credit Model) was used (RUMM2020 software).
Results
There were no disordered thresholds on any of the polytomous items. The static sitting balance subscale (SSB) did not fit the Rasch model (Chi-square=15.68; p=0.0004). Wewere unable to examine DIF due to a large number of extreme cases in the dataset. The dynamic sitting balance subscale (DSB) fitted the Rasch model (Bonferroni adjusted p value=0.005) after splitting item 2 by Barthel categories to adjust for uniform DIF (Chi-square=42.65; p=0.0052). The coordination subscale (COO) fitted the Rasch model and did not display uniform or non-uniform DIF (Chi-square=7.87; p=0.446). In DSB and COO fewer than 5% of the independent t-tests performed on person estimated locations were significant, further supporting unidimensionality of these subscales. Graphical explorationof thresholds for DSB and COO confirmed a hierarchy of dependent items. Person and items were well distributed across the continuum of balance impairment.
Discussion
We were unable to examine SSB in full and further work with patients with very severe static sitting balance impairments is needed. Item 2 of DSB needs to be given detailed attention before assessing people after stroke.
Conclusion
Construct validity of two subscales was confirmed using Rasch analysis. Further work is needed to examine SSB.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 4 July 2007
Venue - Dates: Society for Research in Rehabilitation, Leeds, UK, 2007-07-03 - 2007-07-04

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 58848
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/58848
PURE UUID: 7d09a8de-3584-4dff-bdd9-f300fd4aa4a4

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Aug 2008
Last modified: 04 Nov 2022 17:34

Export record

Contributors

Author: G. Verheyden
Author: P. Kersten

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×