The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Retaliation as a response to procedural unfairness: a self-regulatory approach

Retaliation as a response to procedural unfairness: a self-regulatory approach
Retaliation as a response to procedural unfairness: a self-regulatory approach
When does procedural unfairness result in retaliation, and why do recipients of unfair treatment sometimes pursue and other times inhibit retaliation? Five studies addressed these questions. The authors proposed and found that regulatory focus moderates retaliation against an unfairness-enacting authority: Promotion-focus participants were more likely to retaliate than prevention-focus participants. Promotion focus was associated with, and also heightened the accessibility of, the individual self. In turn, individual-self accessibility influenced retaliation. In fact, prevention-focus participants were as retaliatory as promotion-focus participants under conditions of high individual-self accessibility. Implications for the procedural fairness and regulatory focus literatures are discussed, and suggestions for future research are offered.
0022-3514
1511-1525
Brebels, Lieven
f36eadc9-7569-4ba5-80f7-1490cf153442
De Cremer, David
16aeacc7-ae90-4ab7-9d3c-6818e8b1b6d8
Sedikides, Constantine
9d45e66d-75bb-44de-87d7-21fd553812c2
Brebels, Lieven
f36eadc9-7569-4ba5-80f7-1490cf153442
De Cremer, David
16aeacc7-ae90-4ab7-9d3c-6818e8b1b6d8
Sedikides, Constantine
9d45e66d-75bb-44de-87d7-21fd553812c2

Brebels, Lieven, De Cremer, David and Sedikides, Constantine (2008) Retaliation as a response to procedural unfairness: a self-regulatory approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95 (6), 1511-1525.

Record type: Article

Abstract

When does procedural unfairness result in retaliation, and why do recipients of unfair treatment sometimes pursue and other times inhibit retaliation? Five studies addressed these questions. The authors proposed and found that regulatory focus moderates retaliation against an unfairness-enacting authority: Promotion-focus participants were more likely to retaliate than prevention-focus participants. Promotion focus was associated with, and also heightened the accessibility of, the individual self. In turn, individual-self accessibility influenced retaliation. In fact, prevention-focus participants were as retaliatory as promotion-focus participants under conditions of high individual-self accessibility. Implications for the procedural fairness and regulatory focus literatures are discussed, and suggestions for future research are offered.

Text
unpubBrebels_De_Cremer__Sedikides_2008.pdf - Other
Download (704kB)

More information

Published date: December 2008

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 64153
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/64153
ISSN: 0022-3514
PURE UUID: d74fa845-5f8c-40a9-9e7f-7e6249f1b038
ORCID for Constantine Sedikides: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4036-889X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Dec 2008
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:08

Export record

Contributors

Author: Lieven Brebels
Author: David De Cremer

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×