The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Self-enhancement and self-protection: what they are and what they do

Self-enhancement and self-protection: what they are and what they do
Self-enhancement and self-protection: what they are and what they do
We define self-enhancement and self-protection as interests that individuals have in advancing one or more self-domains or defending against negative self-views. We review ways in which people pursue self-enhancement and self-protection, discuss the role of these motivational constructs in scientific explanations, argue for their importance in maintaining psychological and physical well-being, and consider the conditions in which they are likely to operate. At various points, we address the perennial “cognition-motivation” debate. We argue that, despite the conceptual and practical difficulties that attend this distinction, the pervasiveness of the self-enhancement and self-protection motives makes it impossible and imprudent to ignore them in explaining self-related findings and theories.
1046-3283
1-48
Alicke, Mark D.
f0e9afd2-1f51-4e6e-80d6-7a88421ac578
Sedikides, Constantine
9d45e66d-75bb-44de-87d7-21fd553812c2
Alicke, Mark D.
f0e9afd2-1f51-4e6e-80d6-7a88421ac578
Sedikides, Constantine
9d45e66d-75bb-44de-87d7-21fd553812c2

Alicke, Mark D. and Sedikides, Constantine (2009) Self-enhancement and self-protection: what they are and what they do. European Review of Social Psychology, 20 (1), 1-48. (doi:10.1080/10463280802613866).

Record type: Article

Abstract

We define self-enhancement and self-protection as interests that individuals have in advancing one or more self-domains or defending against negative self-views. We review ways in which people pursue self-enhancement and self-protection, discuss the role of these motivational constructs in scientific explanations, argue for their importance in maintaining psychological and physical well-being, and consider the conditions in which they are likely to operate. At various points, we address the perennial “cognition-motivation” debate. We argue that, despite the conceptual and practical difficulties that attend this distinction, the pervasiveness of the self-enhancement and self-protection motives makes it impossible and imprudent to ignore them in explaining self-related findings and theories.

Text
eprintsAlicke__Sedikides_2009_ERSP.pdf - Other
Download (717kB)

More information

Published date: February 2009
Organisations: Human Wellbeing

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 66032
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/66032
ISSN: 1046-3283
PURE UUID: 08c6f7b0-cbeb-44a7-81ce-35036a80998b
ORCID for Constantine Sedikides: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4036-889X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 22 Apr 2009
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:43

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Mark D. Alicke

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×