The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Reliability Case Notes No. 4: Autosub6000 and Autosub3 actuator potentiometer failure analysis and testing report

Reliability Case Notes No. 4: Autosub6000 and Autosub3 actuator potentiometer failure analysis and testing report
Reliability Case Notes No. 4: Autosub6000 and Autosub3 actuator potentiometer failure analysis and testing report
During the James Cook Cruise 27 Autosub6000 aborted mission 12 due to a failure in the position feedback potentiometer of the stern plane actuator. The same actuator is used on Autosub3 which is heading to the Pine Island glacier in Antarctica in January 2009. A similar failure of the Autosub3 actuator while under the ice would result in the loss of the AUV.
This report initially describes the investigation into the failure of the feedback potentiometer and shows that the potentiometer’s conductive plastic track became detached from its ceramic substrate and broke up. The report then describes the testing performed to evaluate the reliability of the potentiometer. This involved an accelerated aging test to simulate the worst case conditions seen by the potentiometer in the actuator. This was achieved by oscillating the potentiometer at 4Hz to simulate the actuator movements whilst cycling the pressure of the Morlina 10 oil surrounding the potentiometers.
During the testing the 10k? potentiometers used in the actuator were not available, and so 5k? potentiometers from the same range were tested as a substitute. It was assumed that these 5k? potentiometers would produce similar results, however it was found during the testing that the formulation of the 5k? potentiometer track was different from the 10k?; whether this affects the reliability is not known.
Due to the large amount of time required to perform each test only 16 5k? potentiometers were tested. Although no failures occurred, the sample was too small to give a high statistical confidence that the potentiometers would survive the cruise. To further reduce the risk four 5k? potentiometers that were to be used on Autosub3 were tested for approximately 72 hours in a ‘burnt in’ process. As an early failure similar to that of Autosub6000 potentiometer would have been detected during this process, the chance of the potentiometers failing was significantly reduced. Thus the burnt in potentiometers were considered acceptable for use on Autosub 3 during the Pine Island campaign.
Autosub, Autosub6000, Autosub3, potentiometer, actuator, failure
58
National Oceanography Centre Southampton
Furlong, M.E.
332e9aef-8c6b-452f-8b85-712492767458
Brito, M.P.
82e798e7-e032-4841-992e-81c6f13a9e6c
Furlong, M.E.
332e9aef-8c6b-452f-8b85-712492767458
Brito, M.P.
82e798e7-e032-4841-992e-81c6f13a9e6c

Furlong, M.E. and Brito, M.P. (2009) Reliability Case Notes No. 4: Autosub6000 and Autosub3 actuator potentiometer failure analysis and testing report (National Oceanography Centre Southampton Research and Consultancy Report, 58) Southampton, UK. National Oceanography Centre Southampton 30pp.

Record type: Monograph (Project Report)

Abstract

During the James Cook Cruise 27 Autosub6000 aborted mission 12 due to a failure in the position feedback potentiometer of the stern plane actuator. The same actuator is used on Autosub3 which is heading to the Pine Island glacier in Antarctica in January 2009. A similar failure of the Autosub3 actuator while under the ice would result in the loss of the AUV.
This report initially describes the investigation into the failure of the feedback potentiometer and shows that the potentiometer’s conductive plastic track became detached from its ceramic substrate and broke up. The report then describes the testing performed to evaluate the reliability of the potentiometer. This involved an accelerated aging test to simulate the worst case conditions seen by the potentiometer in the actuator. This was achieved by oscillating the potentiometer at 4Hz to simulate the actuator movements whilst cycling the pressure of the Morlina 10 oil surrounding the potentiometers.
During the testing the 10k? potentiometers used in the actuator were not available, and so 5k? potentiometers from the same range were tested as a substitute. It was assumed that these 5k? potentiometers would produce similar results, however it was found during the testing that the formulation of the 5k? potentiometer track was different from the 10k?; whether this affects the reliability is not known.
Due to the large amount of time required to perform each test only 16 5k? potentiometers were tested. Although no failures occurred, the sample was too small to give a high statistical confidence that the potentiometers would survive the cruise. To further reduce the risk four 5k? potentiometers that were to be used on Autosub3 were tested for approximately 72 hours in a ‘burnt in’ process. As an early failure similar to that of Autosub6000 potentiometer would have been detected during this process, the chance of the potentiometers failing was significantly reduced. Thus the burnt in potentiometers were considered acceptable for use on Autosub 3 during the Pine Island campaign.

Text
NOCS_R&C_58.pdf - Other
Download (3MB)

More information

Published date: 2009
Keywords: Autosub, Autosub6000, Autosub3, potentiometer, actuator, failure

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 66320
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/66320
PURE UUID: cec2b013-6c7c-42e3-8e4f-6afeaec405de
ORCID for M.P. Brito: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1779-4535

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 02 Jun 2009
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:54

Export record

Contributors

Author: M.E. Furlong
Author: M.P. Brito ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×