The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Defining incident radiographic hip osteoarthritis for epidemiologic studies in women

Defining incident radiographic hip osteoarthritis for epidemiologic studies in women
Defining incident radiographic hip osteoarthritis for epidemiologic studies in women
Objective. To evaluate definitions of radiographic hip osteoarthritis (RHOA) for use in longitudinal epidemiologic studies of disease incidence in women.
Methods. We studied 5,839 women from the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures who had had serial pelvic radiographs obtained (mean of 8.3 years apart) and who were followed up (mean followup 7.1 years from the time of the second radiograph) for evaluation of clinical outcomes. Definitions of RHOA were assessed for construct validity (association with symptoms and signs at the time of the second radiograph) and predictive validity (association with total hip replacement [THR] and signs and symptoms a mean of 7.1 years later). Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated to assess the strength of association using logistic regression.
Results. The cumulative incidence of RHOA ranged from 2.2% to 11.7%. All definitions displayed significant construct validity; the most consistent was found for composite definitions that required the concurrent presence of 2 or more individual radiographic features and definitions based on stringent criteria for joint space narrowing. All definitions except minimum joint space <2.5 mm displayed consistent predictive validity. Composite definitions had the strongest associations with THR (OR 10.5–18.5) and hip pain (OR 2.6–2.9). The hips identified as having OA by each definition varied, with especially small overlap betweenfindings using definitions based on osteophytes and those using definitions based on joint space narrowing alone.
Conclusion. Most definitions of incident RHOA display good construct and predictive validity. Composite definitions have the best overall performance, and definitions requiring the presence of both osteophytes (in particular, femoral osteophytes) and joint space narrowing would be recommended for most epidemiologic and genetic studies.
0004-3591
1052-1059
Arden, Nigel K.
23af958d-835c-4d79-be54-4bbe4c68077f
Lane, Nancy E.
3bf8d93e-2d26-4bb3-a209-4eb3f16d774f
Parimi, Neeta
922f59aa-fab3-4af6-a56d-3a8d39090516
Javaid, Kassim M.
ebdce154-9c0a-4a1d-9261-9f66bd971184
Lui, Li-Yung
84e8dce3-fe0a-4aa8-b5ca-4673e7969bc6
Hochberg, Marc C.
6f96aee5-49ab-473c-9ffa-82b12ac89aff
Nevitt, Michael
aa7b464e-6ff2-41ce-894f-15846a6699cd
Arden, Nigel K.
23af958d-835c-4d79-be54-4bbe4c68077f
Lane, Nancy E.
3bf8d93e-2d26-4bb3-a209-4eb3f16d774f
Parimi, Neeta
922f59aa-fab3-4af6-a56d-3a8d39090516
Javaid, Kassim M.
ebdce154-9c0a-4a1d-9261-9f66bd971184
Lui, Li-Yung
84e8dce3-fe0a-4aa8-b5ca-4673e7969bc6
Hochberg, Marc C.
6f96aee5-49ab-473c-9ffa-82b12ac89aff
Nevitt, Michael
aa7b464e-6ff2-41ce-894f-15846a6699cd

Arden, Nigel K., Lane, Nancy E., Parimi, Neeta, Javaid, Kassim M., Lui, Li-Yung, Hochberg, Marc C. and Nevitt, Michael (2009) Defining incident radiographic hip osteoarthritis for epidemiologic studies in women. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 60 (4), 1052-1059. (doi:10.1002/art.24382).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate definitions of radiographic hip osteoarthritis (RHOA) for use in longitudinal epidemiologic studies of disease incidence in women.
Methods. We studied 5,839 women from the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures who had had serial pelvic radiographs obtained (mean of 8.3 years apart) and who were followed up (mean followup 7.1 years from the time of the second radiograph) for evaluation of clinical outcomes. Definitions of RHOA were assessed for construct validity (association with symptoms and signs at the time of the second radiograph) and predictive validity (association with total hip replacement [THR] and signs and symptoms a mean of 7.1 years later). Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated to assess the strength of association using logistic regression.
Results. The cumulative incidence of RHOA ranged from 2.2% to 11.7%. All definitions displayed significant construct validity; the most consistent was found for composite definitions that required the concurrent presence of 2 or more individual radiographic features and definitions based on stringent criteria for joint space narrowing. All definitions except minimum joint space <2.5 mm displayed consistent predictive validity. Composite definitions had the strongest associations with THR (OR 10.5–18.5) and hip pain (OR 2.6–2.9). The hips identified as having OA by each definition varied, with especially small overlap betweenfindings using definitions based on osteophytes and those using definitions based on joint space narrowing alone.
Conclusion. Most definitions of incident RHOA display good construct and predictive validity. Composite definitions have the best overall performance, and definitions requiring the presence of both osteophytes (in particular, femoral osteophytes) and joint space narrowing would be recommended for most epidemiologic and genetic studies.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: April 2009
Organisations: Dev Origins of Health & Disease

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 69445
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/69445
ISSN: 0004-3591
PURE UUID: 8b6dc634-1d0f-4d5f-8c82-7d17e1adef8c

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Nov 2009
Last modified: 13 Mar 2024 19:32

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Nigel K. Arden
Author: Nancy E. Lane
Author: Neeta Parimi
Author: Kassim M. Javaid
Author: Li-Yung Lui
Author: Marc C. Hochberg
Author: Michael Nevitt

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×