The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Sorting the wheat from the chaff: a study of the detection of alarms

Sorting the wheat from the chaff: a study of the detection of alarms
Sorting the wheat from the chaff: a study of the detection of alarms
The research in this paper considers the evidence on the success of alarm reduction strategies reported in the open literature. Despite strong beliefs to the contrary, the empirical evidence suggest that alarm reduction strategies have not been as successful as initially expected. This seems to be due to the fact that alarm reduction strategies actually deprive process control operators of information. In order to determine the ability of people to sift through alarm information, a study of alarm detection with three ratios of target to non-target alarms was devised (i.e. 2%, 6% and 10%) and the information was presented at three rates (i.e. 1 second, 4 seconds and 8 seconds). The results show that the ratio of target alarms has no effect on detection performance, but the temporal rate does. Given that process operators are rarely required to acknowledge alarm information in real time, it is suggested that more emphasis should be placed on initial definition of alarms and better presentation methods, rather than attempts to block the flow of alarms that have already been triggered.
alarms, alarm Reduction, false Alarms, signal detection
1435-5566
134-141
Stanton, N.A.
351a44ab-09a0-422a-a738-01df1fe0fadd
Harrison, D.J.
22777ae4-eee2-4f23-b48c-b7f98cf75e85
Taylor-Burge, K.L.
17eba2b6-e95f-43ca-827c-968116aecbca
Porter, L.J.
04607088-a4ef-4439-aa88-934410657b88
Stanton, N.A.
351a44ab-09a0-422a-a738-01df1fe0fadd
Harrison, D.J.
22777ae4-eee2-4f23-b48c-b7f98cf75e85
Taylor-Burge, K.L.
17eba2b6-e95f-43ca-827c-968116aecbca
Porter, L.J.
04607088-a4ef-4439-aa88-934410657b88

Stanton, N.A., Harrison, D.J., Taylor-Burge, K.L. and Porter, L.J. (2000) Sorting the wheat from the chaff: a study of the detection of alarms. Cognition, Technology & Work, 2 (3), 134-141. (doi:10.1007/PL00011496).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The research in this paper considers the evidence on the success of alarm reduction strategies reported in the open literature. Despite strong beliefs to the contrary, the empirical evidence suggest that alarm reduction strategies have not been as successful as initially expected. This seems to be due to the fact that alarm reduction strategies actually deprive process control operators of information. In order to determine the ability of people to sift through alarm information, a study of alarm detection with three ratios of target to non-target alarms was devised (i.e. 2%, 6% and 10%) and the information was presented at three rates (i.e. 1 second, 4 seconds and 8 seconds). The results show that the ratio of target alarms has no effect on detection performance, but the temporal rate does. Given that process operators are rarely required to acknowledge alarm information in real time, it is suggested that more emphasis should be placed on initial definition of alarms and better presentation methods, rather than attempts to block the flow of alarms that have already been triggered.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: August 2000
Keywords: alarms, alarm Reduction, false Alarms, signal detection

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 74168
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/74168
ISSN: 1435-5566
PURE UUID: 0bad028c-4006-480a-9665-4bc25d23f6aa
ORCID for N.A. Stanton: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8562-3279

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Mar 2010
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:54

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: N.A. Stanton ORCID iD
Author: D.J. Harrison
Author: K.L. Taylor-Burge
Author: L.J. Porter

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×