The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Intertextuality: old debates in new contexts

Intertextuality: old debates in new contexts
Intertextuality: old debates in new contexts
In the face of its rivals – “interdisciplinarity”, “intermediality”, “interdiscursivity” – and of the explosion of virtual, visual, and post-colonial forms of cultural expression, “intertextuality” holds a more tenuous critical position today than it enjoyed in the 1970s and 1980s. Is the word merely a shorthand for “connection”, the specificities of which are redundant since the nature of the texts being connected assures them? Is the nodal term “text” in “intertextuality” a major reason for its shift from centre to margin in critical debate and terminology, and hence replacement by the vocabularies of virtual media? Or does “intertextuality” remain useful for unpacking ever more complex twenty-first-century “semiotic encounters” in their trans-nation of texts and images? This essay seeks to address these questions by also exploring an additional dynamic (“window”) to the four which structured my Intertextuality: debates and contexts (2003).
9789042027145
128
15-30
Rodopi
Orr, Mary
3eec40eb-479c-4c9a-b2da-7388a27f9d5c
Saeckel, Sarah
Goebel, Walter
Hamdy, Noha
Orr, Mary
3eec40eb-479c-4c9a-b2da-7388a27f9d5c
Saeckel, Sarah
Goebel, Walter
Hamdy, Noha

Orr, Mary (2009) Intertextuality: old debates in new contexts. In, Saeckel, Sarah, Goebel, Walter and Hamdy, Noha (eds.) Semiotic Encounters: Text, Image and Trans-Nation. (Internationale Forschungen zur Allgemeinen und Vergleichenden Literaturwissenschaft, 128) New York, USA. Rodopi, pp. 15-30.

Record type: Book Section

Abstract

In the face of its rivals – “interdisciplinarity”, “intermediality”, “interdiscursivity” – and of the explosion of virtual, visual, and post-colonial forms of cultural expression, “intertextuality” holds a more tenuous critical position today than it enjoyed in the 1970s and 1980s. Is the word merely a shorthand for “connection”, the specificities of which are redundant since the nature of the texts being connected assures them? Is the nodal term “text” in “intertextuality” a major reason for its shift from centre to margin in critical debate and terminology, and hence replacement by the vocabularies of virtual media? Or does “intertextuality” remain useful for unpacking ever more complex twenty-first-century “semiotic encounters” in their trans-nation of texts and images? This essay seeks to address these questions by also exploring an additional dynamic (“window”) to the four which structured my Intertextuality: debates and contexts (2003).

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2009

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 80090
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/80090
ISBN: 9789042027145
PURE UUID: 598c7115-f510-427b-a19f-7cf5336335e6

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 24 Mar 2010
Last modified: 10 Dec 2021 17:36

Export record

Contributors

Author: Mary Orr
Editor: Sarah Saeckel
Editor: Walter Goebel
Editor: Noha Hamdy

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×