The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Validity of self reported occupational exposure to hand-transmitted and whole-body vibration

Validity of self reported occupational exposure to hand-transmitted and whole-body vibration
Validity of self reported occupational exposure to hand-transmitted and whole-body vibration
OBJECTIVES - To assess the accuracy with which workers report their exposure to occupational sources of hand transmitted (HTV) and whole body vibration (WBV).
METHODS - 179 Workers from various jobs involving exposure to HTV or WBV completed a self administered questionnaire about sources of occupational exposure to vibration in the past week. They were then observed at work over 1 hour, after which they completed a second questionnaire concerning their exposures during this observation period. The feasibility of reported sources of exposure during the past week was examined by questioning managers and by inspection of tools and machines in the workplace. The accuracy of reported sources and durations of exposure in the 1 hour period were assessed relative to what had been observed.
RESULTS - The feasibility of exposure in the previous week was confirmed for 97% of subjects who reported exposure to HTV, and for 93% of subjects who reported exposure to WBV. The individual sources of exposure reported were generally plausible, but occupational use of cars was substantially over-reported, possibly because of confusion with their use in travel to and from work. The accuracy of exposures reported during the observation period was generally high, but some sources of HTV were confused for example, nailing and stapling guns reported as riveting hammers, and hammer drills not distinguished from other sorts of drill. Workers overestimated their duration of exposure to HTV by a median factor of 2.5 (interquartile range (IQR) 1.6-5.9), but estimated durations of exposure were more accurate when the exposure was relatively continuous rather than for intermittent short periods. Reported durations of exposure to WBV were generally accurate (median ratio of reported to observed time 1.1, IQR 1.0-1.2).
CONCLUSIONS - Sources of recent occupational exposure to vibration seem to be reported with reasonable accuracy, but durations of exposure to HTV are systematically overestimated, particularly when the exposure is intermittent and for short periods. This raises the possibility that dose-response relations may have been biased in some of the studies on which exposure standards might be based, and that the levels in currently proposed standards may be too high. Future studies should pay attention to this source of error during data collection.
vibration, exposure, assessment, validity
237-241
Palmer, Keith T.
9f32d151-97b6-4538-bbc0-6a502b26502b
Haward, Barbara
99618059-c4fb-4bae-acaf-b572d664f2a7
Griffin, Michael J.
4b3fc50c-f216-443f-a329-67e450d88bda
Bendall, Holly
06a7d905-42c2-470c-9140-1c3c4442771a
Coggon, David
121cc098-fb7b-4a7e-971a-72b4b263d79b
Palmer, Keith T.
9f32d151-97b6-4538-bbc0-6a502b26502b
Haward, Barbara
99618059-c4fb-4bae-acaf-b572d664f2a7
Griffin, Michael J.
4b3fc50c-f216-443f-a329-67e450d88bda
Bendall, Holly
06a7d905-42c2-470c-9140-1c3c4442771a
Coggon, David
121cc098-fb7b-4a7e-971a-72b4b263d79b

Palmer, Keith T., Haward, Barbara, Griffin, Michael J., Bendall, Holly and Coggon, David (2000) Validity of self reported occupational exposure to hand-transmitted and whole-body vibration. Occupational & Environmental Medicine, 57 (4), 237-241. (doi:10.1136/oem.57.4.237).

Record type: Article

Abstract

OBJECTIVES - To assess the accuracy with which workers report their exposure to occupational sources of hand transmitted (HTV) and whole body vibration (WBV).
METHODS - 179 Workers from various jobs involving exposure to HTV or WBV completed a self administered questionnaire about sources of occupational exposure to vibration in the past week. They were then observed at work over 1 hour, after which they completed a second questionnaire concerning their exposures during this observation period. The feasibility of reported sources of exposure during the past week was examined by questioning managers and by inspection of tools and machines in the workplace. The accuracy of reported sources and durations of exposure in the 1 hour period were assessed relative to what had been observed.
RESULTS - The feasibility of exposure in the previous week was confirmed for 97% of subjects who reported exposure to HTV, and for 93% of subjects who reported exposure to WBV. The individual sources of exposure reported were generally plausible, but occupational use of cars was substantially over-reported, possibly because of confusion with their use in travel to and from work. The accuracy of exposures reported during the observation period was generally high, but some sources of HTV were confused for example, nailing and stapling guns reported as riveting hammers, and hammer drills not distinguished from other sorts of drill. Workers overestimated their duration of exposure to HTV by a median factor of 2.5 (interquartile range (IQR) 1.6-5.9), but estimated durations of exposure were more accurate when the exposure was relatively continuous rather than for intermittent short periods. Reported durations of exposure to WBV were generally accurate (median ratio of reported to observed time 1.1, IQR 1.0-1.2).
CONCLUSIONS - Sources of recent occupational exposure to vibration seem to be reported with reasonable accuracy, but durations of exposure to HTV are systematically overestimated, particularly when the exposure is intermittent and for short periods. This raises the possibility that dose-response relations may have been biased in some of the studies on which exposure standards might be based, and that the levels in currently proposed standards may be too high. Future studies should pay attention to this source of error during data collection.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2000
Keywords: vibration, exposure, assessment, validity
Organisations: Human Sciences Group

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 10471
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/10471
PURE UUID: 66a799b0-7873-4b41-a057-e53b40aaa731

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 24 Feb 2005
Last modified: 11 Nov 2024 17:59

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Keith T. Palmer
Author: Barbara Haward
Author: Michael J. Griffin
Author: Holly Bendall
Author: David Coggon

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×