The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Evaluation of whole-body vibration in vehicles (in special Issue on the 2nd International Conference on Whole-body Vibration Injuries)

Evaluation of whole-body vibration in vehicles (in special Issue on the 2nd International Conference on Whole-body Vibration Injuries)
Evaluation of whole-body vibration in vehicles (in special Issue on the 2nd International Conference on Whole-body Vibration Injuries)
The vibration in 100 different vehicles has been measured, evaluated and assessed according to British Standard BS 6841 (1987) and International Standard ISO 2631 (1997). Vibration was measured in 14 categories of vehicle including cars, lift trucks, tractors, lorries, vans and buses. In each vehicle, the vibration was measured in five axes: vertical vibration beneath the seat, fore-and-aft, lateral and vertical vibration on the seat pan and fore-and-aft vibration at the backrest. The alternative methods of evaluating the vibration (use of different frequency weightings, different averaging methods, the inclusion of different axes, vibration dose values and equivalent r.m.s. acceleration) as defined in the standards have been compared. BS 6841 (1987) suggests that an equivalent acceleration magnitude is calculated using vibration measured at four locations around the seat (x -, y -, z -seat and x -backrest); ISO 2631 (1997) suggests that vibration is measured in the three translational axes only on the seat pan but only the axis with the most severe vibration is used to assess vibration severity. Assessments made using the procedure defined in ISO 2631 tend to underestimate any risks from exposure to whole-body vibration compared to an evaluation made using the guidelines specified in BS 6841; the measurements indicated that the 17 m/s1.75 "health guidance caution zone" in ISO 2631 was less likely to be exceeded than the 15 m/s1.75 "action level" in BS 6841. Consequently, ISO 2631 "allows" appreciably longer daily exposures to whole-body vibration than BS 6841.
195-213
Paddan, G.S.
ee5700cc-0497-4273-8b2d-9ae86adf968b
Griffin, M.J.
24112494-9774-40cb-91b7-5b4afe3c41b8
Paddan, G.S.
ee5700cc-0497-4273-8b2d-9ae86adf968b
Griffin, M.J.
24112494-9774-40cb-91b7-5b4afe3c41b8

Paddan, G.S. and Griffin, M.J. (2002) Evaluation of whole-body vibration in vehicles (in special Issue on the 2nd International Conference on Whole-body Vibration Injuries). Journal of Sound and Vibration, 253 (1), 195-213. (doi:10.1006/jsvi.2001.4256).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The vibration in 100 different vehicles has been measured, evaluated and assessed according to British Standard BS 6841 (1987) and International Standard ISO 2631 (1997). Vibration was measured in 14 categories of vehicle including cars, lift trucks, tractors, lorries, vans and buses. In each vehicle, the vibration was measured in five axes: vertical vibration beneath the seat, fore-and-aft, lateral and vertical vibration on the seat pan and fore-and-aft vibration at the backrest. The alternative methods of evaluating the vibration (use of different frequency weightings, different averaging methods, the inclusion of different axes, vibration dose values and equivalent r.m.s. acceleration) as defined in the standards have been compared. BS 6841 (1987) suggests that an equivalent acceleration magnitude is calculated using vibration measured at four locations around the seat (x -, y -, z -seat and x -backrest); ISO 2631 (1997) suggests that vibration is measured in the three translational axes only on the seat pan but only the axis with the most severe vibration is used to assess vibration severity. Assessments made using the procedure defined in ISO 2631 tend to underestimate any risks from exposure to whole-body vibration compared to an evaluation made using the guidelines specified in BS 6841; the measurements indicated that the 17 m/s1.75 "health guidance caution zone" in ISO 2631 was less likely to be exceeded than the 15 m/s1.75 "action level" in BS 6841. Consequently, ISO 2631 "allows" appreciably longer daily exposures to whole-body vibration than BS 6841.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2002
Additional Information: Special issue edited by Iole Pinto, Massimo Bovenzi, (guest editor) and Michael J. Griffin (assistant guest editor)
Organisations: Human Sciences Group

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 10616
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/10616
PURE UUID: 335658f2-cd26-4e96-bc80-ce1e0c251906
ORCID for M.J. Griffin: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0743-9502

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Oct 2005
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 05:00

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: G.S. Paddan
Author: M.J. Griffin ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×