The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Relative benefits of linear analogue and advanced digital hearing aids

Wood, Sally A. and Lutman, Mark E. (2004) Relative benefits of linear analogue and advanced digital hearing aids International Journal of Audiology, 43, (3), pp. 144-155. (doi:10.1080/14992020400050020).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Speech recognition performance and self-reported benefit from linear analogue and advanced (digital) hearing aidswere compared in 100 first-time hearing aid users withmild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss fitted monaurally with a behind-the-ear (BTE) hearing aid in a single-blind randomized crossover trial. Subjects usedeach aid for 5 weeks in turn, with aid order balancedacross subjects. Three alternative models of digital hearing aid were assigned to subjects according to a balanceddesign. Aid type was disguised to keep subjects blind within practical limitations. Aided speech recognition performance in noise was measured at speech levels of 65 and 75 dB at a speech-to-noise ratio (SNR) of _2 dB forclosed sets of single words. Self-rated benefit was measured using the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) and the Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile (GHABP). Quality of life, hearing aid use and user preferences were also assessed. Speech recognition scores with the digital aids were significantly better at 75 dB than with the analogue aids. Self-reported benefit (APHAB, GHABP) and improvement in quality of life were generally not significantly different between analogue and digital aids, although aversiveness measured with the APHAB was significantly lower with digital aids,and satisfaction measured with the GHABP was greater. The digital aids were preferred significantly more often than the analogue aids, with 61 subjects choosing their digital aid, 26 choosing the analogue aid, and nine being equivocal. Overall, this study shows advantages for advanced digital over simple linear analogue aids interms of both objective and subjective outcomes, although average differences are not large.

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

Published date: March 2004
Organisations: Human Sciences Group

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 10735
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/10735
PURE UUID: 47216d69-23e7-479b-a37e-5827b811e3f0

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 22 May 2006
Last modified: 17 Jul 2017 17:06

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Sally A. Wood
Author: Mark E. Lutman

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×