The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Shipboard analytical intercomparison of dissolved iron in surface waters along a north-south transect of the tropical Atlantic Ocean

Bowie, A.R., Achterberg, E.P., Blain, S., Boyé, M., Croot, P.L., Laan, P., Sarthou, G., De Baar, H.J.W. and Worsfold, P.J. (2003) Shipboard analytical intercomparison of dissolved iron in surface waters along a north-south transect of the tropical Atlantic Ocean Marine Chemistry, 84, (1-2), pp. 19-34. (doi:10.1016/S0304-4203(03)00091-4).

Record type: Article

Abstract

A shipboard analytical intercomparison of dissolved (<0.2 m) iron in the surface waters of the Atlantic Ocean was undertaken during October 2000. A single underway surface (1–2 m) seawater sampling and filtration protocol was used, in order to minimise differences from possible sample contamination. Over 200 samples (1/h) were collected over 12 days and analysed immediately using four different analytical methods, based on three variants of flow injection with luminol chemiluminescence (FI–CL) and cathodic stripping voltammetry (CSV). Dissolved iron concentrations varied between 0.02 and 1.61 nM during the intercomparison. On average, CSV [Electroanalysis 12 (2000) 565] measured 0.08 nM higher iron concentrations than one FI–CL method [Anal. Chim. Acta 361 (1998) 189], which measured 0.13 nM higher iron values than the other two [Anal. Chem. 65 (1993) 1524; Anal. Chim. Acta 377 (1998) 113]. Statistical analyses (paired two-tailed t-test) showed that each analytical method gave significantly different dissolved iron concentrations at the 95% confidence interval. These data however, represent a significant improvement over earlier intercomparison exercises for iron. The data have been evaluated with respect to accuracy and overall inter-laboratory replicate precision, which was generally better than the 95% confidence intervals reported for the NASS Certified Reference Materials. Systematic differences between analytical methods were probably due to the extraction of different physico-chemical forms of iron during preconcentration, either on the micro-column resin (in the FI methods) or with competing ligand equilibration (in the CSV method). Small systematic concentration differences may also have resulted from protocols used for quantification of the analytical blank and instrument calibration.

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

Published date: 2003
Keywords: Dissolved iron, Seawater, Analytical intercomparison, Atlantic Ocean

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 12534
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/12534
ISSN: 0304-4203
PURE UUID: 4cd9eb08-1797-4bd4-a6e0-a022263b7b65

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 26 Nov 2004
Last modified: 17 Jul 2017 17:02

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: A.R. Bowie
Author: E.P. Achterberg
Author: S. Blain
Author: M. Boyé
Author: P.L. Croot
Author: P. Laan
Author: G. Sarthou
Author: H.J.W. De Baar
Author: P.J. Worsfold

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×