The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

On the efficiency of statistical assimilation techniques in the presence of model and data error

On the efficiency of statistical assimilation techniques in the presence of model and data error
On the efficiency of statistical assimilation techniques in the presence of model and data error
[1] Statistically based assimilation methods make use of error statistics. When these statistics apply to data, some aspects of them are known. However, model error statistics are at best poorly known. The variability of these error fields causes the strength of the assimilated signal to vary. This (spatial) variability, plus diffusion, can cause the assimilated signal to rapidly disappear, decreasing the impact of the data. Our demonstration uses a statistical method [from Oschlies and Willebrand, 1996], which assimilates sea surface height using vertical regressions. An idealized Gaussian depression of sea surface height about 10degrees in diameter was assimilated, using both the original statistical scheme and a scheme with a horizontally uniform regression coefficient, to test the effects of variability in model errors. Results indicated that the uniform scheme is more efficient in assimilation of sea surface height than the original scheme ( in that assimilated information is lost less rapidly because of small-scale mixing) for the simplified Gaussian problem, but predictive skill was not improved when assimilating over the full North Atlantic. The influence of interpolated satellite observation errors caused by limitations of satellite track coverage was also assessed, using a chessboard sea surface depression that would be induced from the ( statistically) optimal combination of model and data. Artificial eddies on the scale of the satellite track intervals are induced by including the satellite errors in the ocean model. These eddies dissipate rapidly in the presence of mixing, taking with them much of the assimilated signal. We suggest a possible solution
art. 03133
Killworth, P.D.
9fc0c4a0-e1fb-4073-8997-436b59c74bf2
Li, J.G.
6149c435-ef27-4d24-ae25-c2aed0507dc6
Smeed, D.
79eece5a-c870-47f9-bba0-0a4ef0369490
Killworth, P.D.
9fc0c4a0-e1fb-4073-8997-436b59c74bf2
Li, J.G.
6149c435-ef27-4d24-ae25-c2aed0507dc6
Smeed, D.
79eece5a-c870-47f9-bba0-0a4ef0369490

Killworth, P.D., Li, J.G. and Smeed, D. (2003) On the efficiency of statistical assimilation techniques in the presence of model and data error. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 108 (C4), art. 03133. (doi:10.1029/2002JC001444).

Record type: Article

Abstract

[1] Statistically based assimilation methods make use of error statistics. When these statistics apply to data, some aspects of them are known. However, model error statistics are at best poorly known. The variability of these error fields causes the strength of the assimilated signal to vary. This (spatial) variability, plus diffusion, can cause the assimilated signal to rapidly disappear, decreasing the impact of the data. Our demonstration uses a statistical method [from Oschlies and Willebrand, 1996], which assimilates sea surface height using vertical regressions. An idealized Gaussian depression of sea surface height about 10degrees in diameter was assimilated, using both the original statistical scheme and a scheme with a horizontally uniform regression coefficient, to test the effects of variability in model errors. Results indicated that the uniform scheme is more efficient in assimilation of sea surface height than the original scheme ( in that assimilated information is lost less rapidly because of small-scale mixing) for the simplified Gaussian problem, but predictive skill was not improved when assimilating over the full North Atlantic. The influence of interpolated satellite observation errors caused by limitations of satellite track coverage was also assessed, using a chessboard sea surface depression that would be induced from the ( statistically) optimal combination of model and data. Artificial eddies on the scale of the satellite track intervals are induced by including the satellite errors in the ocean model. These eddies dissipate rapidly in the presence of mixing, taking with them much of the assimilated signal. We suggest a possible solution

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2003

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 1320
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/1320
PURE UUID: c112f914-9dfd-45c2-a995-0ef4becdb7f2

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 23 Apr 2004
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 04:43

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: P.D. Killworth
Author: J.G. Li
Author: D. Smeed

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×