The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Quality and the scholarship of teaching: learning from subject review

Ottewill, Roger and Macfarlane, Bruce (2004) Quality and the scholarship of teaching: learning from subject review Quality in Higher Education, 10, (3), pp. 231-241. (doi:10.1080/1353832042000299513).

Record type: Article


This paper examines some of the ways in which subject review can contribute to the scholarship of teaching. Subject review was a quality assessment process conducted under the auspices of the UK’s Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. A preliminary discussion considers the potential and pitfalls of using subject review as a basis for learning about current academic practice. The analysis draws on 162 institutional reports, covering business and management provision and produced during the period 2000–1. The pedagogic principles that underpinned subject review judgements, such as flexibility, transparency and pedagogic pluralism, are identified. These suggest that, while ‘fitness for purpose’ was the explicit criterion for judging institutional standards, in practice, reviewers were guided by a series of implicit evaluative principles. To some extent, these principles may be linked to learning theory and the ongoing debate concerning the scholarship of teaching.

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

Published date: December 2004
Keywords: scholarship of teaching, learning, subject review


Local EPrints ID: 13970
ISSN: 1353-8322
PURE UUID: 6812c113-cc37-4521-9901-744f515b8c70

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Jan 2005
Last modified: 17 Jul 2017 16:59

Export record



Author: Roger Ottewill
Author: Bruce Macfarlane

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton:

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.