Quality and the scholarship of teaching: learning from subject review

Ottewill, Roger and Macfarlane, Bruce (2004) Quality and the scholarship of teaching: learning from subject review Quality in Higher Education, 10, (3), pp. 231-241. (doi:10.1080/1353832042000299513).

This is the latest version of this item.


Full text not available from this repository.


This paper examines some of the ways in which subject review can contribute to the scholarship of teaching. Subject review was a quality assessment process conducted under the auspices of the UK’s Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. A preliminary discussion considers the potential and pitfalls of using subject review as a basis for learning about current academic practice. The analysis draws on 162 institutional reports, covering business and management provision and produced during the period 2000–1. The pedagogic principles that underpinned subject review judgements, such as flexibility, transparency and pedagogic pluralism, are identified. These suggest that, while ‘fitness for purpose’ was the explicit criterion for judging institutional standards, in practice, reviewers were guided by a series of implicit evaluative principles. To some extent, these principles may be linked to learning theory and the ongoing debate concerning the scholarship of teaching.

Item Type: Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi:10.1080/1353832042000299513
ISSNs: 1353-8322 (print)
Keywords: scholarship of teaching, learning, subject review
ePrint ID: 13970
Date :
Date Event
December 2004Published
Date Deposited: 07 Jan 2005
Last Modified: 16 Apr 2017 23:48
Further Information:Google Scholar
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/13970

Available Versions of this Item

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item