Differential use of trails by forest mammals and the implications for camera trap studies, a case study from Belize, Central America
Differential use of trails by forest mammals and the implications for camera trap studies, a case study from Belize, Central America
Relative abundance indices are often used to compare species abundance between sites. The indices assume that species have similar detection probabilities, or that differences between detection probabilities are known and can be corrected for.
Indices often consist of encounter frequencies of footprints, burrows, markings or photo captures along trails or transect lines, but the assumption of equal detection probabilities is rarely validated. This study analyses detection probabilities of a range of Neotropical mammals on trails in dense secondary forest, using camera-trap and track data.
Photo captures of the two large cats, jaguars (Panthera onca) and pumas (Puma concolor), were correlated solely with trail variables, while photo captures of their potential prey species had no correlation or negative correlation with trail variables.
The Neotropical mammals varied greatly in their tendency to follow or cross trails based on footprints surveys. This indicates that camera locations on trails will have varying detection probability for these Neotropical mammals.
Even the two similar-sized jaguars and pumas, occupying relatively similar niches, differed subtly in their use of trails. Pumas followed trails more completely while jaguars were more likely to deviate from trails. The ecological significance of these findings is that jaguars seem to be more willing to use the forest matrix away from trails than are pumas.
We conclude that trail-based indices, such as photographic captures or tracks along trails, are not appropriate for comparison between Neotropical species, and not even between relatively similar species like jaguars and pumas.
bias, camera trapping, detection probability, jaguars, pumas, relative abundance, trail use
126-133
Harmsen, Bart J.
c84e0703-d49d-4b09-980a-423b09fd5536
Foster, Rebecca J.
842ac52b-bc3d-4d9c-bf81-61b2e4b6964e
Silver, Scott
9ec95392-6231-4cb5-bb86-205392ea08d8
Ostro, Linde
a1caeae8-bd3d-40f0-ad0a-aacd76795278
Doncaster, C. Patrick
0eff2f42-fa0a-4e35-b6ac-475ad3482047
January 2010
Harmsen, Bart J.
c84e0703-d49d-4b09-980a-423b09fd5536
Foster, Rebecca J.
842ac52b-bc3d-4d9c-bf81-61b2e4b6964e
Silver, Scott
9ec95392-6231-4cb5-bb86-205392ea08d8
Ostro, Linde
a1caeae8-bd3d-40f0-ad0a-aacd76795278
Doncaster, C. Patrick
0eff2f42-fa0a-4e35-b6ac-475ad3482047
Harmsen, Bart J., Foster, Rebecca J., Silver, Scott, Ostro, Linde and Doncaster, C. Patrick
(2010)
Differential use of trails by forest mammals and the implications for camera trap studies, a case study from Belize, Central America.
Biotropica, 42 (1), .
(doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2009.00544.x).
Abstract
Relative abundance indices are often used to compare species abundance between sites. The indices assume that species have similar detection probabilities, or that differences between detection probabilities are known and can be corrected for.
Indices often consist of encounter frequencies of footprints, burrows, markings or photo captures along trails or transect lines, but the assumption of equal detection probabilities is rarely validated. This study analyses detection probabilities of a range of Neotropical mammals on trails in dense secondary forest, using camera-trap and track data.
Photo captures of the two large cats, jaguars (Panthera onca) and pumas (Puma concolor), were correlated solely with trail variables, while photo captures of their potential prey species had no correlation or negative correlation with trail variables.
The Neotropical mammals varied greatly in their tendency to follow or cross trails based on footprints surveys. This indicates that camera locations on trails will have varying detection probability for these Neotropical mammals.
Even the two similar-sized jaguars and pumas, occupying relatively similar niches, differed subtly in their use of trails. Pumas followed trails more completely while jaguars were more likely to deviate from trails. The ecological significance of these findings is that jaguars seem to be more willing to use the forest matrix away from trails than are pumas.
We conclude that trail-based indices, such as photographic captures or tracks along trails, are not appropriate for comparison between Neotropical species, and not even between relatively similar species like jaguars and pumas.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: January 2010
Keywords:
bias, camera trapping, detection probability, jaguars, pumas, relative abundance, trail use
Organisations:
Electronics & Computer Science
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 142073
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/142073
PURE UUID: 91d434b0-a238-4d75-b09a-76c9cb3d5339
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 01 Apr 2010 09:01
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:38
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Bart J. Harmsen
Author:
Rebecca J. Foster
Author:
Scott Silver
Author:
Linde Ostro
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics